Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Vashishtha Bricks Udhyog vs Mining Engineer, Department Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1338 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1338 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
M/S Vashishtha Bricks Udhyog vs Mining Engineer, Department Of ... on 8 February, 2021
Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1584/2021

M/s Vashishtha Bricks Udhyog, Having Its Address At Village
Bahramda, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan Through
Its Proprietor Mrs. Sangeeta Devi W/o Shri Naresh Sharma
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.     Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology,
       Bharatpur, Rajasthan
2.     Joint Secretary (Mines), Government Secretariat, Jaipur
       Metropolitan, Jaipur
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR

Order

08/02/2021

The instant writ petition has been filed by seeking a direction

to set aside the order dated 23.07.2020 whereby the petitioner

has been asked to deposit certain amount in respect of dues

against Royalty and interest thereon.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner has also filed revision petition against the said order,

however, the revision petition of the petitioner has not been

decided and the Authority has given the date on various occasions

and as such, the matter is posted on 22.02.2021.

Learned counsel submitted that this Court is required to

interfere in the present matter as the recovery against the

petitioner is in respect of period of the COVID-19 and as such, the

(2 of 3) [CW-1584/2021]

State Government itself has issued various circulars from time to

time of not effecting recovery during the period of COVID-19.

Learned counsel submitted that due to the order dated

23.07.2020, the respondents are determined to take action

against the petitioner under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act,

1956 for effecting the recovery.

Learned counsel submitted that on the one hand the revision

petition of the petitioner is not heard and on the other hand the

respondents are sending letters to recover the amount from the

petitioner.

Learned counsel has also placed reliance on the judgment

passed by Principal Seat at Jodhpur in SB Civil Writ Petition No.

4624/2019 (Amarchand Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.),

decided vide order dated 27.03.2019.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

perused the material available on record.

This Court finds that the petitioner has already approached

the Authority provided under the Rules by filing the revision

petition. The order-sheets which have been placed on record by

the petitioner reflect that the notices in the revision petition have

been issued on 12.10.2020 and next date was fixed on

18.11.2020. The order-sheets further shows that the record from

the Mining Engineer, Department of Mines and Geology, Bharatpur,

Rajasthan was summoned and as such, next date was fixed on

21.12.2020. The order-sheet dated 21.12.2020 shows that the

record has not been received and as such, the matter has been

posted on 22.02.2021.

This Court finds that once the matter is subjudice before the

Revisional Authority, this Court may not like to interfere for

(3 of 3) [CW-1584/2021]

quashing the recovery notice dated 23.07.2020. The petitioner is

within his own right to pursue remedy provided under the Rules.

This Court, however, gives liberty to the petitioner to move

to the Revisional Authority for deciding the prayer of interim relief

on the next date of hearing.

The Revision Authority may also meanwhile summon the

record from the Mining Engineer, Department of Mines and

Geology, Bharatpur, Rajasthan and earnest effort be made to get

the record before the next date of hearing. It is expected from the

Authorities that considering the urgency of the matter, Revision

Petition be decided expeditiously.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J

Parul Sharma/Ramesh Vaishnav/105

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter