Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banwari S/O Shri Ram Prasad vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 7675 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7675 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Banwari S/O Shri Ram Prasad vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 December, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar Vyas
          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                      BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Criminal Misc. (SOS) Application No.1181/2021

                                           In

                   S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1659/2021

Banwari S/o Shri Ram Prasad, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of
Badh      Salempur,    Police        Station,       Kudgaon,       District   Karauli
(Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Sevar, District
Bharatpur)
                                                                      ----Appellant
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                    ----Respondent
For Appellant(s)           :        Mr. Rahul Sharma for
                                    Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)          :        Mr. Imran Khan, PP



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS

                                       Order

15/12/2021

Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

The appellant has filed the appeal along with

application for suspension of sentence.

The appeal has been preferred against the judgment of

conviction and sentence dated 29.09.2021 passed by the Court of

Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,

2012 and Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005

Karauli (Rajasthan) in Session Case No.24/2020 (CIS

No.24/2020), by which the appellant has been convicted for

offence under Section 376 (A)(B) of IPC read with Section 5/6 of

the POCSO Act and sentenced to maximum term of twenty years.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-1181/2021]

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the

appellant that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this

case. During trial, the prosecutrix (PW-1) has turned hostile. She

has not supported the prosecution case. In her statement, she has

not levelled any allegation against the appellant. She has stated

that nothing happened with her. The mother of the prosecutrix

(PW-2) in her statement has stated that the appellant beat her

daughter but, apart from this, nothing was done by the present

appellant. She has been declared hostile. PW-3, who is relative of

the prosecutrix has also turned hostile and has not supported the

prosecution version. She also stated that the FIR was lodged as

the appellant beat the prosecutrix. There is not sufficient evidence

on record to prove that the samples which was sent for DNA test

was seized as per the Rules. Medical evidence (statement of PW-

4-Dr. Anita Gupta) also does not support the prosecution version.

In her cross-examination, she has stated that at the time of

medical examination, there was no signs of any sexual violence

against the prosecutrix.

Learned trial court has erred in convicting and

sentencing the appellant on the basis of hostiled witnesses. The

DNA report alone cannot be made basis for conviction of the

appellant. It can only be relied as corroborative evidence but there

is no corroboration of the DNA report. All the important witnesses

of prosecution have stated that the appellant did not commit any

offence. During trial, the appellant was on bail. Hearing of the

appeal may take long time. There is no criminal antecedents of

the appellant. Learned counsel has relied upon the judgment of

(3 of 3) [SOSA-1181/2021]

Gujrat High Court in the case of Premjibhai Bachubhai Khasiya Vs.

State of Gujarat & Ors., 2009 CriLJ 2888.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the

evidence available on record carefully.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application

for suspension of sentence.

Taking into consideration the submissions of learned

counsel for the appellant, evidence available on record and overall

facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon

detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to

allow the application for suspension of sentence.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence

is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-

appellant Banwari S/o Shri Ram Prasad shall remain

suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and he shall be

released on bail, provided the appellant furnishes a personal bond

of Rs.1,00,000/- (One Lakh) and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty

Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his

appearance in this Court on 17th January, 2022 and as and when

called upon to do so.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J

Sunita/88

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter