Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7609 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence)
Application No.1141/2021
In
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1844/2021
Aalam S/o Aas Mohammad @ Genda, R/o Ramsingh Ki Dhani,
Tan Jairoli, Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
(Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar)
----Accused-Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence)
Application No.1215/2021
In
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1958/2021 Jahul S/o Idrish @ Iddi, R/o Ramsingh Ki Dhani, Tan Jairoli, Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.). Presently Jogeshwari Talluka Gangapur, District Aurangabad (Maharashtra).
(Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar)
----Accused-Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Chitrank Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
14/12/2021
(2 of 3)
Heard on applications for suspension of sentence.
Appellants have filed the appeals along with applications for
suspension of sentence.
The appeals have been preferred against the judgment dated
21.10.2021 passed by the court of Special Judge, Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, No.1, Alwar in Sessions
Case No.39/2018(358/2017), by which the appellants have been
convicted under Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to maximum term
of twenty years.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the appellants
that they have been falsely implicated in the case. Prosecutrix
(P.W.1), father of the prosecutrix (P.W.2), mother of the
prosecutrix (P.W.3) and other important witnesses have turned
hostile. They have not levelled any allegation against the accused-
appellants. Therefore, in view of the fact that all the important
witnesses including the prosecutrix have not supported the
prosecution version, learned trial court has erred in convicting and
sentencing the appellants. The appellants were on bail during trial
and presently, they are in custody. Hearing of appeals may take
long time.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the applications for
suspension of sentence.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record carefully.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel
for the appellants, overall facts and circumstances of the case but
(3 of 3)
without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court
deems just and proper to allow the applications for suspension of
sentence.
Accordingly, the applications for suspension of sentence are
allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
appellants Aalam S/o Aas Mohammad @ Genda and Jahul
S/o Idrish @ Iddi shall remain suspended till disposal of criminal
appeals and they be released on bail, provided each of them
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of
Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for
their appearance in this Court on 17th January, 2022 and as and
when called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Hemant/48-49
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!