Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7320 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence App. No. 1112/2021
IN
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1804/2021
Saddam Husain (Saddam) Son Of Ramjan @ Ramjuddin, R/o
Neemsara Pipalda Khatoli District Kota (At Present Confined At
Central Jail Kota)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
07/12/2021
1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
2. The appellant has filed the appeal along with
application for suspension of sentence.
3. The appeal has been preferred against the judgment
dated 28.10.2021 passed by Special Judge, POCSO Act, 2012 and
Child Rights Commission Act, 2005, No. 5, Kota in Session Case
No. 02/2020 CIS No. 235/2019 by which the appellant has been
convicted for offence/s under Sections 354B of IPC, 9M/10 of
POCSO Act and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act and sentenced to maximum
term of five years imprisonment.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
(2 of 3) [SOSA-1112/2021]
appellant that appellant has been falsely implicated in the case.
The case has been filed due to enmity between the father of the
victim and the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant has
referred to statements of PW2 (victim), who has admitted in her
cross examination that on the complaint of the relatives of
appellant her father was apprehended by the police. Thereafter, it
is further submitted that complaint under Section 107-151 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure was filed against the father of the
victim and due to that enmity, this false case has been lodged
against the appellant. The victim has also admitted in her cross
examination that the appellant was in false impression and doubt
that mobile was stolen by her. Her father was in judicial custody
on that day. He has been sentenced to maximum term of five
years out of which he has already served one year and seven
months of sentence. As per certificate under Rule 311(3) of the
Rajasthan High Court Rules, the appellant was on bail during trial.
Now, he is in custody since date of judgment i.e. 28.10.2021.
Hearing of the appeal may take long time.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application
for suspension of sentence.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record.
7. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the parties, evidence available on record and overall
facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon
merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to allow the
application for suspension of sentence.
(3 of 3) [SOSA-1112/2021]
8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence
is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
appellant Saddam Husain (Saddam) Son Of Ramjan @ Ramjuddin,
shall remain suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and he
shall be released on bail provided the appellant furnishes a
personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh) and two sureties of
Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial Court for his appearance in this Court on 07.01.2022
and as and when called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Pooja /44
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!