Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhupendra Kumar Baid vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 19107 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19107 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Bhupendra Kumar Baid vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 December, 2021
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6895/2021

Bhupendra Kumar Baid S/o Parasmal Baid, Aged About 33 Years, r/o Pani Ki Tanki Ke Pass, Jorawarpura Teh. Nokha Dist. Bikaner, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Smt. Mamta Baid W/o Bhupendra Kumar Baid D/o Subhkaran Mahnot, B/c Baid aged about 31 years r/o Pani Ki Tanki Ke Pass, Jorawarpura Teh. Nokha Dist. Bikaner, Rajasthan. At Present Residing At C/o Subhkaran Mahnot, Village Udasar Dist. Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

15/12/2021 The present misc. petition has been filed for quashing the

FIR No.224/2021 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana,

District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 498A, 406, 120-B,

315, 323, 354, 417, 418, 420, 424 and 426 of the IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties

have compromised the matter outside the Court. The compromise

deed has been filed before the registry of this Court.

The fact of compromise is not disputed by learned counsel

for respondent No. 2.

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-6895/2021]

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the

judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian

Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, State of M.P.

V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors. [AIR 2019 SC 1296] & Ram

Gopal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Criminal

Appeal No. 1489 and 1488 of 2012 decided on 29.09.2021)

and prays that the FIR may be quashed.

In view of the aforementioned compromise arrived at

between the parties and considering the fact that the compromise

is not disputed by learned counsel for the respondent as also

applying the law laid down in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab

(Supra), State of M.P. V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors. (Supra) &

Ram Gopal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Supra)

this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers

under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the

impugned FIR No. 224/2021 registered at Police Station Mahila

Thana, District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 498A, 406,

120-B, 315, 323, 354, 417, 418, 420, 424 and 426 of the IPC is

quashed and set aside.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

94-payal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter