Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18069 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 21/2021
Govind Swami
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG (Incharge) Mr. Navneet Singh Birkh on behalf of Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, ASG Mr. Govind Singh Charan, C.I.
SHO, P.S. Nayashehar, Bikaner
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
01/12/2021
The instant habeas corpus petition has been filed by the
petitioner Govind Swami with an allegation that his minor sister
Mst. 'P' (hereinafter referred to as 'the corpus/detenue') was
kidnapped on 26.10.2020 and since then, she is not traceable. The
habeas corpus petition was filed way back in the month of
January, 2021. Notices were issued to the respondents and the
police officials concerned were directed to make efforts for tracing
out the corpus and the suspect. Till date, repeated factual reports
have been filed by the learned AAG appearing for the police
officials but the fact remains that till date, no clues have been
received regarding the whereabouts of the missing girl. On
20.09.2021, learned Additional Advocate General submitted that
efforts being made to trace out the missing girl met a road-block
(2 of 3) [HC-21/2021]
because the UIDAI refused to release the Aadhaar Card details of
the suspect and the corpus to the I.O. We therefore directed the
UIDAI to share these details with the investigating officer.
Shri Navneet Singh Birkh appeared for Shri Mukesh
Rajpurohit, learned ASG and urged that in view of the amendment
brought around in Section 33 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of
Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016,
the details of Aadhaar Card cannot be shared without providing
opportunity of hearing to the authority and the concerned Aadhaar
number holder. He submits that before issuing any direction to the
UIDAI, the Aadhaar Card holder has to be mandatorily heard and
thus, the order dated 20.09.2021 may be recalled. Shri Birkh also
placed reliance on the judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme
Court in the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr.
vs. Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition (Civil)
No.494/2012) decided on 24.08.2017, and urged that no
information can be disclosed without hearing the person in respect
of whom the disclosure of information has been sought.
We have thoughtfully considered the submissions advanced
by Shri Birkh and, have gone through the relevant statutory
provisions. We have also given our respectful consideration to the
observations made by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (supra).
Suffice it to say that in the present case, the controversy
pertains to the disappearance of the corpus (whose Aadhar details
are being sought) as she is missing since October, 2020. The
Aadhaar details are being sought for by the police officials so that
efforts can be made to trace the corpus. For all we know that the
victim might have been liquidated by now.
(3 of 3) [HC-21/2021]
As the suspect and the victim are reported to be missing and
as the victim is a minor girl, there is an imminent danger to her
life and limb and thus, by virtue of exercising powers under Article
21 of the Constitution of India and the extraordinary writ
jurisdiction conferred upon this Court by Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, we are of the view that the possibility of
providing an opportunity of hearing to the Aadhaar Card holder is
virtually impossible as the suspect and the corpus are missing for
more than last one year. Moreover, we are of the firm view that
the confidentiality of the Aadhaar details provided to the
investigating agency shall definitely be maintained because the
information would be provided to the I.O. who would be under an
obligation to use the same only for the purposes of getting further
leads to trace out the corpus.
Consequently, we hereby direct the UIDAI to provide the
relevant police officials to the extent prescribed by the Aadhaar
(Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and
Services) Act, within a period of 15 days from today so that the
efforts to trace out the corpus can be intensified.
List on 07.01.2022.
(SAMEER JAIN),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J
25-Tikam/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!