Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mool Chand vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 13154 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13154 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mool Chand vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 August, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11026/2021

Mool Chand S/o Late Sh. Sohan Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Fad Bazar, Gersariyo Ka Mohalla, Bikaner.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Chief Engineer, (Administration) Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur.

3. Additional Chief Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Bikaner Region, Bikaner.

4. Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Circle Bikaner, Bikaner.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Pramendra Bohra
For Respondent(s)         :



                     JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                 Judgment

26/08/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the

respondents to consider petitioner's representation to be posted at

a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is

lying vacant.

2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the

direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before

the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period

of two weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier

representation and certified copy of the order instant.

(2 of 2) [CW-11026/2021]

3. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the

competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with

law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt

thereof.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

110-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter