Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harpreet Singh Alias Happy And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another
2024 Latest Caselaw 16574 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16574 P&H
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Harpreet Singh Alias Happy And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another on 9 September, 2024

                                       Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:118276



CRM-M-20463-2024(O&M)
                                 1




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

259                                            CRM-M-20463-2024(O&M)
                                               Date of Decision: 09.09.2024


HARPREET SINGH ALIAS HAPPY AND ANOTHER                            ....Petitioners

                                     VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER                                      ....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Present :     Mr. Mitul Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

              Mr. Satjot Singh, AAG, Punjab.

              Ms. Nisha Rana, Advocate for
              Ms. Priyanka Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code

of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.23 dated 27.02.2021 under

Sections 323, 324, 452, 506, 148, 149 (Section 325 added later on) IPC

registered at Police Station Bullowal, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab and all the

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated

04.04.2024 (Annexure P-2).

2. This Court vide order dated 18.07.2024 had directed the parties

to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded

and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the

genuineness of the compromise.

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:118276

CRM-M-20463-2024(O&M)

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the

learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hoshiarpur and got their statements

recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has

submitted report dated 24.08.2024 to the effect that the compromise has

been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or

undue influence. It is also mentioned in the report that five accused i.e.

Jarnail Singh, Bhupinder Singh, Arvinder Singh, Jaskaran Singh @ Karan

and Harpreet Singh @ Happy have been arrayed as accused in this case.

However, through this petition only the petitioners no.1 & 2 and the

complainant have compromised the matter. Separate statements of the

petitioners and complainant/respondent No.2 as well as the Investigating

Officer had been recorded. It is further mentioned in the report that a

compromise has been effected between petitioners no.1 & 2 and

complainant/respondent no.2 and the petitioners have not been declared

proclaimed person in this case. There is no other case pending against them.

4. The factum of compromise having arrived at between the

parties has not been disputed by learned State counsel as well as counsel for

respondent No.2. Learned State counsel, however, has submitted that it is a

case of partial compromise as the co-accused are not party to the same and it

might have repercussions upon the trial. In the opinion of this Court, since it

has come on record that the compromise has been effected between the

parties to maintain peace and harmony and as there are bleak chances of

conviction of the petitioners, therefore, partial quashing or part quashing of

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:118276

CRM-M-20463-2024(O&M)

the FIR qua the present petitioners only, can be allowed. In this regard

reliance can be placed upon the observations made by Delhi High Court in

"Sunil Tomar Vs. State of NCT of Delhi", 2022(2) Crl. CC 179 and

"Lovely Salhotra and another vs. State of NCT of Delhi", (2018) 12 SCC

391 as well as judgments passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in

"Parambir Singh Gill vs. Malkiat Kaur", 2010 (1) RCR (Criminal) 256

and "Samay Singh vs. State of Haryana" 2023 NCPHHC 99612.

5 As per the discussion so made above, no useful purpose would

be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the

instant FIR.

6 Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment

of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and

another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012)

10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.23 dated 27.02.2021 under

Sections 323, 324, 452, 506, 148, 149 (Section 325 added later on) IPC

registered at Police Station Bullowal, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab and all

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated

27.05.2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner herein only.

( MANISHA BATRA ) 09.09.2024 JUDGE Deepak Patwal

1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

2. Whether reportable : Yes/No

3 of 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter