Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19259 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:136719
CWP-28110-2024 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
107 CWP-28110-2024
Date of Decision :19.10.2024
Faqir Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. Shivam Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
***
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view
the judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-4629-2012
titled as Sunil Kumar Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and others
decided on 19.02.2018, the petitioner is entitled for the grant of benefit of
service rendered by him in an aided institution, which benefit is not being
extended to him by the respondents, which action of the respondents is
totally arbitrary and illegal hence, the respondents be directed to grant the
said benefit to the petitioner in terms of the order passed by this Court in
Sunil Kumar Sharma (supra).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated 12.08.2024
(Annexure P-4) but the same is still pending consideration with the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:136719
respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a
direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an
appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG,
Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-
State and submits that in case, legal notice dated 12.08.2024 (Annexure P-4)
has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is
still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be
decided by the competent authority by passing an appropriate speaking order
within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of copy of this
order and in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the
same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of
the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed, which order
will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view
the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be
disposed of having been not pressed any further.
Ordered accordingly.
October 19, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
aarti JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!