Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yogesh And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 18974 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18974 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Yogesh And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others on 28 October, 2024

Author: Kirti Singh

Bench: Kirti Singh

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:141720
CRM-M-45985-2024 (O&M)                                              1




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                          CHANDIGARH


Sr. No.290                                       CRM-M-45985-2024 (O&M)
                                                  Date of decision : 28.10.2024

Yogesh and another                                              ..... Petitioners


                                     VERSUS

State of Haryana and others                                   ..... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH

Present:      Mr. J.S. Mehndiratta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

              Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

              Mr. R.A Singh, Advocate for
              Mr. Mohd. Sultan, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.

                                         *****

KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS,

2023 for quashing of FIR No.388 dated 29.06.2021, under Sections 379 IPC

registered at Police Station Sadar Bhiwani, District Bhiwani and all other

consequential proceedings arising therefrom (including report under Section

173 Cr.P.C. which was presented on 18.01.2024 under Sections 120-B, 180,

34, 379, 411, 420 & 483 Cr.P.C.) on the basis of the compromise dated

05.08.2024 (Annexure P2).

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the

case file.

1 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:141720

3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated

18.09.2024, directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa

Magistrate for recording their statements with regard to the compromise.

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated 16.10.2024 has

been received from the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani. A perusal

of the said report reveals that statements of the concerned persons have been

recorded in the present case, who have stated that the matter has been settled

between them and they have no objection in case the FIR in question is

quashed. The compromise effected between them is genuine, without any

undue influence and coercion.

5. The Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others

vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, held that High Court

has power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow the compounding of

non-compoundable offence and quash the prosecution where the High Court

is of the view that the same was required to prevent the abuse of the process

of law or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. This power of quashing is

not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.

6. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State

of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, had observed that in

order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of

Court, inherent power can be used by this Court to quash criminal

proceedings in which a compromise has been effected. The relevant portion

of para 57 of the said judgment reads thus:-

2 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:141720

"57. The position that emerges from the above discussion

can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing

a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its

inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given

to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section

320 of the Code.

Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory

limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline

engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii)

to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.

xxx xxx xxx. "

7. In view of the afore-referred judgments, perusing the report of

the trial Court regarding amicable settlement between the petitioner(s) and

the complainant, this Court finds that quashing the FIR will accord a quietus

to all disputes between the parties and it is in the interest of both sides to

bury the hatchet and lead a peaceful life. Thus, no useful purpose would be

served in continuing the proceedings and in order to secure the ends of

justice, the criminal proceedings in the present case deserve to be quashed.

8. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.388

dated 29.06.2021, under Sections 379 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar

Bhiwani, District Bhiwani and all other consequential proceedings

(including report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. which was presented on

18.01.2024 under Sections 120-B, 180, 34, 379, 411, 420 & 483 Cr.P.C.) are

quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of the compromise dated 05.08.2024

3 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:141720

(Annexure P2), subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the

Poor Patient Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh within a period of

one month.

9. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.




                                                     (KIRTI SINGH)
                                                        JUDGE

28.10.2024
Ramandeep Singh

Whether speaking / reasoned                                   Yes/No
Whether Reportable                                            Yes/No




                                 4 of 4

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter