Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18913 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:140375
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
123 CWP-29153-2024
Date of decision: 25.10.2024
HC/PR SUKHDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER ....PETITIONERS
Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. K.K. Thakur, Advocate and
Mr. Naveen Kaushal, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India are seeking direction to the respondents to count the
service rendered by them as Special Police Officer for qualifying service for
the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that case of
the petitioners is squarely covered by judgment dated 15.02.2018 (Annexure
P-6) of this Court in Sukhjeet Singh and others v. The State of Punjab,
CWP No.9936 of 2017.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab who on advance
notice is present in Court, submits that in terms of judgment of this Court in
Sukhjeet Singh (supra), the respondent-authorities in the case of various
officials have considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts
that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:140375
of judgment of this Court in Sukhjeet Singh (supra) and pass an appropriate
order within three months from today.
4. In the wake of statement made by learned State counsel, the present
petition stands disposed of.
25.10.2024 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL]
manoj JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!