Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18742 P&H
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
CWP-1408-2023 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(242)
CWP-1408-2023
Date of decision:- 22.10.2024
Dharambeer and another ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:- Ms. Reena Rani, Advocate for
Mr. Rajeev Sharma (Raju), Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Bahri, Addl. A.G., Haryana
for respondents No.1 to 3.
****
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. By way of instant petition, petitioners have approached this Court
under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter-alia for issuance
of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing impugned order dated
06.01.2023, Annexure P-1, passed by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative
Societies, Rewari-respondent No.3, whereby petitioners, who were the
President and Secretary of Society-respondent No.4, were placed under
suspension.
2. Response has been filed on behalf of official respondents No. 1 to
3, wherein it has been submitted that the petitioners are accused of
committing various irregularities pertaining to allotment of plots of the
Society and of constructing a Community Centre in a park without getting
necessary approval.
authenticity of this order/judgment
3. State counsel submits that various complaints were received
against the petitioners and they were issued several notices, but they failed
to produce the relevant record. He submits that the petitioners filed a joint
reply in response to show cause notices and after hearing them, order dated
23.01.2023 was passed under Section 35 of the Haryana Cooperative
Societies Act, 1984, whereby petitioners have been removed from the post
of President and Secretary. He submits that this order has been separately
challenged by the petitioners by filing CWP-2276-2023, which is pending
for consideration before this Court. He submits that in view of the
subsequent development, prayer made in the writ petition has become
infructuous.
4. Counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the subsequent
development as well as pendency of the writ petition as pointed out by the
State counsel.
5. In view of the above, writ petition has been rendered infructuous
and is dismissed as such.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
JUDGE
22.10.2024
Kamal
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!