Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19461 P&H
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024
122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 54668 of 2024
Date of Decision: 05.11.2024
Sukhwinder Singh ...Pe oner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate
for the pe oner.
Ms. Swa Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Sta on Sec ons
193 19.07.2023 City Kapurthala 420, 467, 468 IPC
Seeking quashing of enquiry report dated 03.07.2024 conducted in the FIR cap oned above, the pe oner has come up before this Court under Sec on 528 BNSS, 2023.
2. State counsel submits that ini ally preliminary inquiry was conducted by DSP and FIR was registered, however in FIR some another officer of the same rank had conducted inquiry and he did not find any substance in the allega on and have proposed to file cancella on report. The file was also approved by Senior Superintendent of Police.
3. Given above, there is no merit in the present pe on.
4. At this stage, counsel for the pe oner wishes to withdraw the present pe on.
5. Pe on stands disposed of as withdrawn. All pending applica ons, if any, stand disposed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
05.11.2024
Jyo Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes
Whether reportable: No.
authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!