Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19327 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:142818
1
CR-6323-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.145
CR-6323-2024
Date of Decision: 04.11.2024
PATTI L. HARTEL
....Petitioner
Versus
RAJEEV KUMAR
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:- Ms. Ramandeep Kaur Bhathal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
*****
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court, under
Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of direction to the
Appellate Court, for deciding the application under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that initially, the
applicant had filed an appeal before the Appellate Court, to assail the
judgment dated 22.03.2023 passed by the Trial Court, copy whereof is
Annexure P-1 and the said appeal was entertained by the Appellate Court on
24.05.2023. At the inception stage, the case was adjourned for 29.05.2023,
for consideration. Thereupon, on the next date i.e. 29.05.2023, notice was
ordered to be issued to the respondent and the case was fixed further, for
03.07.2023. Furthermore, while making reference to various zimini orders,
the counsel submits that the case was adjourned further, from time to time,
on account of service, not being complete.
Also, it is submitted that earlier also, the petitioner had filed the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:142818
CR-6323-2024
revision petition i.e. CR-6266-2023, which was dismissed as withdrawn,
vide order dated 15.02.2024, copy whereof is Annexure P-10. The same
was withdrawn, solely on account of the respondent making appearance and
stating about the respondent having made appearance before the Appellate
Court. Also, it is submitted that in pursuance of withdrawal of the said
revision petition, though the respondent made appearance before the
Appellate Court, but the arguments were not addressed. In this regard, the
counsel has drawn the attention of this Court, to the zimini orders placed on
record as Annexure P-12. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that a
direction be given to the Appellate Court, to pass an appropriate order, on
the stay application, at first instance.
On query by the Court, it is disclosed by the counsel for the
petitioner that the next date fixed before the Appellate Court is 21.11.2024.
The case being adjourned, time and again, as evident from the zimini orders
placed on record. In the given circumstances, since the respondent is
already making appearance before the Appellate Court, through counsel, the
Appellate Court is hereby requested to dispose of the stay application, within
a period of three weeks, from the next date fixed in the appeal.
In view of the aforesaid terms, the revision petition stands
disposed of.
(ARCHANA PURI)
04.11.2024 JUDGE
Himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!