Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9986 P&H
Judgement Date : 8 May, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:065169
CWP-21155-2023 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-21155-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision:08.05.2024
Sat Pal
......Petitioner
versus
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Present:- Mr. R.L. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for
Dr. Neha Awasthi, Advocate for respondents.
*****
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI J.(Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of
Certiorari for quashing the order dated 28.09.2018 (Annexure P-2)
thereby an amount of Rs.1,22,656/- has been deducted from the gratuity
of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted the petitioner
was working as AFM in the office of respondents-Uttar Haryana Bijli
Vitran Nigam (hereinafter to be referred to as 'Nigam') and retired after
attaining the age of superannuation on 30.09.2018. Learned counsel
further submitted that at the time of retirement of the petitioner, an
amount of Rs.1,22,652/- was deducted from the gratuity of the petitioner
without issuance of any charge-sheet, show cause notice or any kind of
proceedings against the petitioner.
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:065169
CWP-21155-2023 2
3. He further submitted that when the writ petition was filed,
notice of motion issued to respondents on 21.09.2023 and now on
29.04.2024 the respondents have paid the aforesaid amount of
Rs.1,22,652/- but the aforesaid is only the principal amount and the
petitioner is entitled for the grant of interest on the aforesaid amount from
the date of retirement till the date of its disbursement in view of the Full
Bench judgment of this Court in A.S. Randhawa vs. State of Punjab
1997 (3) SCT 468.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for respondents
submitted that since all the amount has been paid to the petitioner, the
present petition would be rendered as infructuous.
5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of
the view that an amount of Rs.1,22,652/- was deducted from the gratuity
of the petitioner without issuance of any charge-sheet, show cause notice
or any kind of proceedings against the petitioner. After issuance of notice
of motion by this Court, the respondents appears to have rectified their
mistake and now the respondents have paid the aforesaid amount to the
petitioner vide cheque dated 29.04.2024. Learned counsel for the
petitioner has produced a photocopy of the cheque today amounting to
Rs.1,22,652/- dated 29.04.2024 which is hereby taken on record as 'Mark
X'..
6. The petitioner had retired in the year 2018 and the amount
has been paid on 29.04.2024 and, therefore, the petitioner is entitled for
the grant of interest @6% per annum on the aforesaid amount.
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:065169
CWP-21155-2023 3
7. In view of the above, the present petition is partly allowed.
The respondents are directed to release the interest on the aforesaid
amount i.e. Rs.1,22,652/- @6% per annum to the petitioner starting from
the date of his retirement plus two months till the date of actual
disbursement in accordance with law within a period of four months from
today.
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI)
JUDGE
08.05.2024
shweta
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!