Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dalvinder Alias Jelly And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 9821 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9821 P&H
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Dalvinder Alias Jelly And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Others on 7 May, 2024

            279


                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                     AT CHANDIGARH
                                                                        CRM-M-3983-2024
                                                                                     2024
                                                           Date of Decision: May 07, 2024

            DALVINDER ALIAS JELLY AND ORS.                                  ........Petitioners
                                  Versus
            STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS                                    ........Respondents

            CORAM:             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

            Present:Dr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
                    Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana.
                    Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.
                                        ****
            HARKESH MANUJA,
                    MANUJA J. (ORAL)

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the

petitioners pray for quashing of case bearing FIR No.98 98 dated 22.06.2018

registered under Sections 379-B, 379 427 and 506 of IPC at P.S. Radaur,

District Yamunanagar along with all consequential proceedings arising

out of the same on the basis of compromise dated 08.01.2024.

2. As per allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners inflicted

injuries on respondents No.2 to 4 with iron rod and gandasi besides

damaging their vehicle.

3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated

25.01.2024 directed the parties to appear before trial Court for getting their

statements recorded as regards the veracity of the compromise arrived at

between them..

4. In pursuance to the order dated 25.01.2024, a report dated

23.02.2024 has been received from the concerned Co Court, urt, stating that the

compromise in the present case is genuine and voluntary.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that once, a

compromise has been arrived at between the parties without any pressure

and respondents No.2 to 4 have no objection as regards quashing of FIR

as well as all other subsequent proceedings arising out of the same

against the petitioners; the dispute purely personal in nature, there does

not appear to be any impediment as regards quashing of present FIR. He

also submits that even, in order to maintain peace and harmony between

the parties, particularly under the circumstances wherein the alleged

offences have no societal interest involved, it would be appropriate to

render complete quietus to the aforementioned dispute by quashing the

FIR on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

6. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that

allegations in the present FIR are of serious nature and he opposes the

prayer made in the petition.

7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone

through the records including the report dated 23.02.2024. The parties

having settled their dispute so as to live in peace in future, no useful

purpose would be served by proceeding further with the criminal

proceedings. In the light of above developments, no cause remains for

the trial Court to invest further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR.

The compromise in question is even found to be fully in consonance

with the directions issued by this Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs.

State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR(Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs.

State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".

8. Moreover, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions

from his client, submit that he volunteers to serve public cause by

providing three wheel chairs to Civil Hospital, Yamuna Nagar.

9. Thus, in view of the aforesaid report, accompanied by

statements of both the parties as well as keeping in mind the law laid

down in the aforementioned judgments, the petition is allowed and FIR

No. 98 dated 22.06.2018 registered under Sections 379-B, 427 and 506 of

IPC at P.S. Radaur, District Yamunanagar along with all consequential

proceeding arising therefrom, are hereby quashed.

10. Accordingly, petition stands, allowed, however subject to

providing three wheel chairs to Civil Hospital, Yamuna Nagar within a

period of two weeks from today as volunteered by the petitioner against

due receipt issued by the concerned Civil Surgeon, who shall prepare

an inventory in this regard for its regular inspection by the Director

concerned. A copy of the receipt shall also be sent to the office of

Advocate General, Haryana at the earliest for maintaining records in

this regard.





            07.05.2024                                        (HARKESH MANUJA)
            Tejwinder                                              JUDGE
                                    Whether speaking/reasoned   Yes/No
                                       Whether Reportable       Yes/No








 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter