Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9747 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062590
CRM-M-22213-2024 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-22213-2024
Date of decision : May 06, 2024
Surender Kumar ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present : Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner
KULDEEP TIWARI,J. (ORAL)
1. Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks
quashing of the order dated 31.3.2023 (Annexure P-1), whereby, the
learned Additional Sessions Judge concerned has directed him to
deposit 20% of the compensation amount within 60 days before the
learned trial Court concerned, and order dated 10.7.2023 (Annexure
P-2), whereby, order granting suspension of sentence was ordered
to be vacated and the bail granted to the petitioner is also ordered to
be cancelled because of non-payment of compensation amount.
2. The petitioner has been convicted by the learned trial
Court concerned vide judgment dated 27.2.2023, and vide order of
sentence dated 3.3.2023, he was sentenced to undergo simple
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062590
imprisonment for a period of one year, and to pay compensation to
the tune of double of the amount of impugned cheque, under
Section 357(3) Cr.P.C.
3. The verdict of conviction, and order of sentence (supra)
caused grievance to the petitioner, and triggered him to institute a
statutory appeal thereagainst, before the learned appellate court
concerned, which is pending consideration. However, the learned
appellate court concerned has, through the impugned order dated
31.3.2023 (Annexure P-1), directed him to deposit 20% of the
compensation amount within 60 days therefrom, before the learned
trial Court concerned. Since the petitioner failed to deposit 20% of
the amount, the learned appellate court concerned through the
impugned order dated 10.7.2023, cancelled the bail of the petitioner
and bail bonds were forfeited to the State. Feeling aggrieved by the
impugned orders (supra), the petitioner has now approached this
Court, through the instant petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset
submits that he is not assailing the impugned orders (supra), on
merits and that the petitioner is ready and willing to comply with
orders dated 31.3.2023 (Annexure P-1), if a reasonable time is
granted to him.
5. In view of the aforesaid, without going into the merits of
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062590
the case, and considering the innocuous and bonafide prayer, as
made by the petitioner is accepted. The impugned order 10.7.2023
(Annexure P/2), is quashed and the petitioner is permitted to
deposit 20% of the compensation amount as awarded by the
learned appellate court concerned, within three months from today.
On deposit of the same, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on
his furnishing fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial
court concerned.
6. Disposed of accordingly.
( KULDEEP TIWARI )
May 06, 2024 JUDGE
'tiwana'
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No
Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!