Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9737 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062327-DB
2024:PHHC:062327-DB
223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-21730-2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision: May 06, 2024
SURENDER AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Versus
IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD. ..... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate for the respondent (through VC).
****
LISA GILL, J.
1. Prayer in this writ petition is for directing respondents to regularize
petitioners' account in terms of circular dated 01.07.2015 and circular dated
17.03.2016 issued by Reserve Bank of India in respect to 'Framework for
Revival and Rehabilitation of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises'. Prayer is
also for setting aside notice dated 25.07.2022 under Section 13(4) of
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short - 'SARFAESI Act') and sale notice dated
20.08.2022.
2. Availing of credit facility by petitioners from respondent -
Financial Institution is a matter of record as is financial indiscipline for reasons
as may be. Plea raised is that re-structuring of loan account was illegally denied
by respondent - financial institution and proceedings under SARFAESI Act have
been initiated in derogation of applicable provisions of law.
3. Written statement on behalf of respondent has been filed raising
preliminary objection qua entertainability of this writ petition itself. Reliance has
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062327-DB
CWP-21730-2022 (O&M) -2-
been placed on judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Phoenix ARC
Private Limited versus Vishwa Bharti Vidya Mandir and others, 2022 (1)
RCR (Civil) 888. Learned counsel for respondent points out that petitioner did
not deposit the amount in terms of interim order dated 21.09.2022 passed in this
writ petition, which was a conditional order, therefore, secured asset/property in
question was successfully auctioned (sale certificate being issued in favour of
successful purchaser on 05.12.2022 itself). It had been directed vide order dated
21.09.2022 that no coercive action would be taken against petitioners subject to
petitioners depositing a sum of Rs.2,56,500/- within two weeks. Said amount had
not been deposited.
4. None had appeared on behalf of petitioners on the last occasion
when this writ petition was taken up for hearing. Today again, there is no
representation on behalf of petitioners. It appears that petitioners are not
interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
5. Present petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default and for non
prosecution.
6. Needless to say, petitioners are at liberty to avail remedies available
to them in accordance with law in respect to any grievance(s) which they may
have to proceedings under SARFAESI Act initiated against them.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(AMARJOT BHATTI)
May 06, 2024 JUDGE
rts
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!