Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9708 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062428
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
259
WP-22284-2021(O&M)
C
Date of decision: 06.05.2024
Sarwan Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed for directing the respondents for
refixation of the pay scale of the petitioner after granting him the higher pay scale.
2. Learned counsel submits that the claim of the petitioner is for
refixationofpayaftergrantinghimhigherpayscaleoncompletionof4,9and14
yearsofservicealongwithallconsequentialbenefits,whichhaswronglynotbeen
granted,onaccountoftheNoReportCertificate,whichotherwisehastobetreated
as good in terms of Sarabjot Kaur vs. State of Punjab and others,
CWP-9545-2010, decided on01.09.2011,AnnexureP-14,renderedbyrelyingon
para 16 of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kamal Kumar Gupta vs.
State of Haryana and Others, 1991 (1) SCT 57, wherein it was categorically
held that non-recording of ACRs cannot be thereasonofdisadvantageandgrant
him ACP, which has been denied on technical grounds,there being special reports
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:062428
CWP-22284-2021(O&M) -2-
ofnon-availabilityofACRs,theworkandconductoftheofficialbeingsatisfactory
and nothing adverseagainsthim. Shethus,atthisstage,oninstructions,submits
that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, the respondents are directed to
decidehisclaiminatimeboundmanner,keepinginviewtheaforesaidjudgments
squarely covering his case, special reports being available and his work and
conduct being upto the mark and by granting an opportunity of hearing to him.
3. Learned State counsel has no objection to thelimited prayer made.
4. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the
case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to
consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, taking note of the afore-referred
judgments,withinaperiodof4months,whichthisCourthasnoreasontobelieve
theauthoritieswouldnotaddressinajust,fairandreasonablemanner.Upondoing
so, after notice and hearing offeredtohimandiffoundentitled,grantthebenefit
forthwith. Needless to say,iftheordersareadversetohisinterest,thesameshall
contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 6.05.2024
M.Kamra
hether speaking/reasoned W : es / No Y Whether reportable : Yes / No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!