Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Major Singh vs State Of Punjab
2024 Latest Caselaw 10202 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10202 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Major Singh vs State Of Punjab on 13 May, 2024

Author: Alka Sarin

Bench: Alka Sarin

                                                                                                      -1-

                         CRM-M-13788-2024




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                                   CHANDIGARH

                         225                                             CRM-M-13788-2024 (O&M)
                                                                         Reserved on : 08.05.2024
                                                                         Pronounced on : 13.05.2024

                         MAJOR SINGH                                                       ....Petitioner

                                                             VERSUS

                         STATE OF PUNJAB                                                ....Respondent

                         CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

                         Present :      Ms. Riffi Birla, Advocate for the petitioner.

                                        Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG Punjab for the respondent.

                         ALKA SARIN, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner

in FIR No.04 dated 08.08.2019 under Sections 21/61/85 and Sections 22/27

and 29 (added later on) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Act, 1985 registered at Police Station SSOC Fazilka, District Fazilka.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the

petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and has been in

custody for a period of 10 months and 12 days and that there is no other case

registered and/or pending against the petitioner. Learned counsel would

further contend that the co-accused were granted bail in the present case vide

order dated 31.05.2022 passed in CRM-M-10319-2022 titled as Malook

Singh Vs. State of Punjab and vide order dated 31.10.2022 passed in CRM-

integrity of this judgment/order.

CRM-M-13788-2024

M-32957-2022 titled as Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina Vs. State of Punjab.

Learned counsel would further contend that though the petitioner was stated

to have been apprehended with Heroin, however, on receipt of the FSL

Report it transpires that the same was Tramadol Hydrochloride.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the State has referred to the

status report filed by way of affidavit dated 07.05.2024 of Varanjit Singh,

PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, State Special Operation Cell, Fazilka

to contend that the FIR was registered against three accused persons namely,

Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina his brother, namely, Major Singh (the petitioner

herein) and his father, namely, Malook Singh on the statement of ASI Rohit

Marufia. It is further averred that on 08.08.2019 ASI Deepak Kumar along

with Constable Mukhtiar Singh and Constable Iqbal Singh were present in

the Office at Counter Intelligence, Sub Unit, Mamdot. Sh. Raj Kumar

Mekla, Deputy Commandant 29 Battalion, BSF Mamdot came and told them

that he was posted at Mamdot area on secret duty and a secret informer came

and informed him that accused, namely, Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina, Major

Singh (the petitioner herein) and Malook Singh were smuggling Heroin and

had links with Pakistani smugglers and used to import Heroin on the Indo-

Pak Border from Pakistani smugglers by contacting them through phone and

internet. It was also informed that the accused persons including the

petitioner had imported Heroin from Pakistani smugglers near their house

and if they are apprehended and strictly interrogated, Heroin could be

recovered. On the basis of the said information, raids were conducted where

integrity of this judgment/order.

CRM-M-13788-2024

the accused were apprehended and arrested. Along with the status report, the

FSL Report has also been appended. A perusal of the FSL Report reveals

that the ingredients have been mentioned as Tramadol Hydrochloride.

Custody certificate has also been filed and as per the custody certificate the

petitioner has been in custody for a period of 10 months and 12 days and

there is no other case registered and/or pending against the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State would further contend that the petitioner had

been declared as a Proclaimed Offender on 23.07.2021 and was later

apprehended on 27.06.2023 and hence it is not a fit case for grant of regular

bail. It has further been pointed out that out of 8 prosecution witnesses, 3

stand examined. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to deny the

fact that both the co-accused have since been granted regular bail by this

Court.

4. Heard.

5. In the present case both the co-accused, namely, Sukhchain

Singh @ Chaina and Malook Singh have since been granted regular bail by

this Court vide orders dated 31.05.2022 passed in CRM-M-10319-2022 and

dated 31.10.2022 passed in CRM-M-32957-2022. The case set up by the

State was that Heroin had been recovered in a polythene bag which had been

buried at the back of the house. The said packet, which was recovered, was

sealed and after following the due procedure was sent for analysis by the

FSL. As per the FSL Report the ingredients of the recovered powder were

found to be Tramadol Hydrochloride. There is no other case registered

integrity of this judgment/order.

CRM-M-13788-2024

and/or pending against the petitioner. Out of 8 witnesses, only 3 have been

examined till date. The petitioner has been in custody for a period of 10

months and 12 days. The trial is likely to take some time to conclude and no

useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars

any further.

6. Keeping in view the custody of the petitioner and in view of the

above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court

deems it to be a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the

petitioner. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his

furnishing heavy bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Illaqa

Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Trial Court concerned.

7. However, the Prosecution will always be at liberty to apply for

cancellation of bail in case the petitioner is found to be misusing the

concession of bail in any manner.

8. It is also made clear that any observation made herein shall not

be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

9. Disposed off. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed

off.



                         13.05.2024                                           (ALKA SARIN)
                         Aman Jain                                                JUDGE

                                           NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
                                                   Whether reportable: YES/NO







integrity of this judgment/order.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter