Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mukhtyar Singh Alias Lucky And Another vs State Of Haryana And Another on 9 May, 2024
Author: Jasjit Singh Bedi
Bench: Jasjit Singh Bedi
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:064843
274A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3165-2022
Date of decision : 09.05.2024
MUKHTYAR SINGH AND ANOTHER
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Ms. Aditi Girdhar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana.
Ms. Pearl Narang, Advocate for
Mr. Neeraj Goel, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of an FIR No.45
dated 08.03.2016 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 148, 149,
395, 436 and 506 IPC, 1860 at Police Station Kalayat, Kaithal, Haryana
along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis
of a compromise arrived at between the parties.
Vide order dated 26.11.2021 this Court had directed the
parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements
recorded with regard to the compromise dated 06.12.2021 and
22.12.2021 (P-2 & P-3) and the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court was to
submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the
said order.
Pursuant to the order dated 07.02.2022 passed by this Court,
the parties have appeared before the District and Sessions Judge, Kaithal
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:064843
and as per the report dated 02.03.2022 submitted to this Court, both the
parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties
have a effected genuine compromise without there being any pressure,
coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote
possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution
case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like
situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be
faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the
accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance
with the direction issued by the Court in "Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs.
State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs.
State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".
Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner, while placing
reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Versus State of Gujarat and another,
2012(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 589 and this Court in Joginder Singh &
another Vs. State of Punjab and another, CRM-M-23739-2010
decided on 27.04.2011, Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab &
another, CRM-M-37395-2016 decided on 16.05.2017, Bhoj Raj Vs.
State of Punjab & another, CRM-24945-2019 decided on 27.09.2019
and Vimal Kalra & others Versus State of Punjab & another, CRM-
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:064843
M-20355-2022, decided on 25.07.2022 submits that partial quashing of
the FIR was possible on the basis of a compromise.
In view of the aforesaid report of the District and Sessions
Judge, Kaithal accompanied by statements of both the parties, the FIR
No.45 dated 08.03.2016 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 148,
149, 395, 436 and 506 IPC, 1860 at Police Station Kalayat, Kaithal,
Haryana along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are
hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI)
JUDGE
09.05.2024
JITESH
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
3 of 3
