Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arshdeep Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 6480 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6480 P&H
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Arshdeep Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 21 March, 2024

                                   Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041481
                                                                            -1-

                                                             2024:PHHC:041481
CRM-M-59268-2023

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                          CHANDIGARH
(278)
                                                       CRM-M-59268-2023
                                           Date of Decision:-March 21, 2024


Arshdeep Singh and another
                                                                 ......Petitioners
                                     Versus


State of Punjab and others
                                                               ......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
                    ****

Present:      Mr. H.S. Mander, Advocate for the petitioners.

              Mr. R.S. Bhatta, DAG, Punjab.
              Mr. Munish, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3.

                    ****

ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

seeking quashing of FIR No. 52 dated 05.03.2021, registered under

Sections 307, 323, 326, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police

Station Mataur, SAS Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P-1) and all consequential

proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated

20.09.2023 (Annexure P-2).

2. Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a

compromise, this Court vide order dated 24.11.2023 directed the parties to

appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements

recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 20.03.2024 has

been received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, SAS Nagar,

Mohali, stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041481

2024:PHHC:041481 CRM-M-59268-2023

voluntary and the same is without any pressure, coercion or undue

influence.

3. Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondents

No. 2 & 3 admit the factum of compromise and submit that they have no

objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis.

4. Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have

amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal proceedings in

such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate

conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be

exercised in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in

cases Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and

Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC

406 that criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly

those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or

family disputes, should be quashed when the parties have resolved their

disputes among themselves in a bona fide manner.

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "State of Madhya

Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan" (2019) 5 SCC 688, has upheld that the High

Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash the criminal proceedings in

respect of non compoundable offences which are private in nature and do

not have serious impact on society.

6. Keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court

in the aforesaid judgment, it is crystal clear that the dispute where the

wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have

resolved their entire dispute, the High Court will be within its jurisdiction to

quash the criminal proceedings if it is known that because of compromise

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041481

2024:PHHC:041481 CRM-M-59268-2023

arrived at between the parties, there is remote possibility of securing

conviction of the accused. In fact, in such cases, the Supreme Court has

clearly observed that it would amount to extreme injustices, if despite

settlement having been arrived at between the parties, the criminal

proceedings are allowed to continue.

7. Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No. 52 dated

05.03.2021, registered under Sections 307, 323, 326, 148, 149 of the Indian

Penal Code, at Police Station Mataur, SAS Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P-1)

and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed

qua the petitioners, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 25,000/- to be

deposited by the petitioners jointly and Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited by

respondents No.2 & 3 jointly within one month from today in Poor Patients

Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.





                                                     (ALOK JAIN)
                                                        JUDGE
March 21, 2024
Parul

                  Whether speaking/reasoned:-        Yes/No
                  Whether Reportable:-               Yes/No




                                 3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter