Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6346 P&H
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:040460
WP-23151-2015 (O&M)
C 2024:PHHC:040460 1
CWP-710-2016 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
215-2 cases
WP-23151-2015 (O&M)
C
Date of decision: 20.03.2024
Jaspal Kaur and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Punjab School Education Board and another
...Respondents
CWP-710-2016 (O&M)
Gurmeet Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus
Punjab School Education Board and another ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. K.L. Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
r. R.S. Kalra, Advocate and M Ms. Mona Yadav, Advocate for the respondents.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.(Oral)
1. This common order shall dispose of the above petitions as they
involve the same issue.
2. Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petitions is for directing the
respondentstograntsalarytothepetitionersattheminimumofthepayscale
plus all allowance as revised from time to time and arrears of salary.
3. Learned counsel would submit that the petitioners were
appointed on contract basis on a salary of Rs.4,000/- per month, which was
increasedtoRs.7810/-,andthereaftertoRs.13500/-.However,theregularpay
scale for the post of clerk i.e. Rs.10300-34800+3200 GP, wasnotgrantedto
them. This issue stands decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:040460 WP-23151-2015 (O&M) C 2024:PHHC:040460 2 CWP-710-2016 (O&M)
No.22252-2011 titled asThePrincipalSecretarytoGovt.ofPunjabPWD
PublicHealthandothersvs.HansRajandothers,decidedon10.01.2018,
Annexure A-1, based on the judgment in State of Punjab and others vs.
JagjitSingh(2017)1SCC148,whichhasbeenclarifiedvidejudgmentdated
16.08.2022 passed in Contempt Petition (Civil) No.399 of 2020 in SLP
No.25389 of 2022 titled as Bahadur Singh and others vs. Jaspreet Kaur
Talwar and others, Annexure A-2. He, on instructions, prays that the
petitioners would be satisfied, in case a time bound direction is giventothe
respondents to consider their claim, keeping in view the aforesaid judgments.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the
limited prayer made.
5. Inviewoftheaforesaidandwithoutcommentinguponthemerits
ofthecase,thispetitionisherebydisposedofwithadirectiontorespondents
to consider and decide their claims, by taking into account the aforesaid
submissions as also the judgments relied upon, within a period of 4 months
and if found entitled, necessary benefit be granted to the petitioners forthwith.
6. A photocopy ofthisorderbeplacedonthefileoftheconnected
case.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 2 0.03.2024 Hemant
hether speaking/reasoned W : es / No Y Whether reportable : Yes / No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!