Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6219 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:039185
CWP-13686-2015 2024:PHHC:039185 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(207) CWP-13686-2015
Date of Decision : March 19, 2024
Raj Kumar .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Ms. Komal Balain, Advocate, for
Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present
writ petition, the petitioner was claiming regularization in service from the
date of completion of 240 days in terms of the Policy dated 19.02.1979
(Annexure P-4) of the Government which was relied in the case of other
similarly situated employees to grant the benefit of regularization.
2. Learned State counsel submits that the Policy of 1979 has
already been withdrawn and even the judgment of this Court giving
directions to grant regularization on completion of 240 days, has already
been set aside by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal
No.2979 of 1992 titled as State of Haryana vs. Piara Singh, decided on
12.08.1992.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:039185
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view
the statement of learned State counsel, the present writ petition may kindly
be disposed of having been not pressed any further.
4. Ordered accordingly.
March 19, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
harsha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!