Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Darshan Singh vs Pepsu Road Transport Corporation
2024 Latest Caselaw 5698 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5698 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Darshan Singh vs Pepsu Road Transport Corporation on 13 March, 2024

                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035596




117
                                     2024:PHHC:035596
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH

                                               CWP-5899-2024 (O&M)
                                            Date of decision: 13.03.2024

Darshan Singh (Retd.)
                                                                ....Petitioner
                             Versus
PEPSU Road Transport Corporation
                                                             ....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

Present:    Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of

the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of

mandamus, directing the respondents to release the overtime allowance

payable to the petitioner in view of the communication dated

21.08.2023 (Annexure P-1) alongwith interest @ 18% p.a. or

alternatively to decide his claim in the light of the law laid down in

C.W.P. No. 15306 of 2016, titled as "Hari Ram and others Vs. Pepsu

Road Transport Corporation, Nabha Road, Patiala" decided on

04.09.2017 (Annexure P-4) and C.W.P. No. 3704 of 2018 titled as

"Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another vs Appellate

Authority Under the Payments of Wages Act, 1936-cum-Additional

District Judge, Sangrur and others" decided on 06.11.2019 (Annexure

P-5) and more so, in view of the judgment rendered in Satbir Singh and

others Vs. State of Haryana and others, 2002 (2) SCT 354 (DB)

wherein it has been held that similarly situated persons should be

released the due benefits by the Department of its own. Further to direct

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035596

CWP-5899-2024 (O&M) -2- 2024:PHHC:035596

the respondents to consider and grant the petitioner overtime allowance

for the period before 2016 on pro-rata/average basis for which the

respondents are claiming loss of records on account of fire. Further to

issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to place on record

the decision wherein it was decided to convert the overtime work done

by the employees into rests rather than paying the overtime allowance,

and thereafter, to quash the same by holding it to be contrary to the

PEPSU Road Transport Corporation (Conditions of appointment and

Service Regulations), 1981 and Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961, as

referred in the petition, especially in the light of law laid down to the

effect that the instructions/decision contrary to the statutory regulations

cannot sustain, especially in view of Sant Ram Sharma vs State of

Rajasthan", 1968(1) SCR 111.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset confines his

prayer for deciding legal notice dated 10.01.2024 (Annexure P-8). He

submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied, if the said legal

notice is decided by passing a speaking order within a time bound

frame.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Ramesh Roy, Advocate for Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, who

is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and

raised no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for

the petitioner.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone

through the record of the case.

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035596

CWP-5899-2024 (O&M) -3- 2024:PHHC:035596

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or

the claim being made by the petitioner in the present petition, the

respondent - Managing Director, PEPSU Road Transport Corporation,

Patiala is directed to consider and decide the claim made in the legal

notice dated 10.01.2024 (Annexure P-8) in accordance with law, by

passing a speaking order within a period of 03 months from the date of

receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner is found

entitled, his claim be released within a period of 04 weeks thereafter. In

case, the respondents are of the opinion that the claim of the petitioner

merits rejection the same be adjudicated upon by passing a speaking

order after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner

within the time as stipulated hereinabove.

7. The petition stands disposed of.





                                               (NAMIT KUMAR)
                                                   JUDGE

13.03.2024
yakub



             Whether speaking/reasoned:              Yes/No

             Whether reportable:                     Yes/No




                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035596

                                3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter