Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surjeet And Another vs State Of Haryana
2024 Latest Caselaw 5408 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5408 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Surjeet And Another vs State Of Haryana on 11 March, 2024

                                                        Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:034772




CRA-S-616-2024 (O&M)                                   2024:PHHC:034772
                                                                      1

109
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH

                                                CRA-S-616-2024 (O&M)
                                                Date of decision: 11.03.2024


SURJEET AND ANOTHER
                                                             ....Appellants.

                                             Versus

STATE OF HARYANA
                                                             ....Respondent.


CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY

Present:-    Mr. Ajay Arora Bharti, Advocate,
             for Ms. Divya Narula, Advocate,
             for the applicants-appellants.

             Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.

                            *****

SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)

CRM-6975-2024

1. Keeping in view the averments made in the application,

exemption from filing the certified judgment/order dated 12.01.2024 is

allowed.

2. Disposed of.

Main appeal

1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment of

conviction and order of sentence dated 12.01.2024, passed by learned

Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Judge Special Court (under NDPS

1 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:034772

CRA-S-616-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:034772

Act, 1985), Kaithal, whereby the appellants had been held guilty in

case FIR No.124 dated 07.10.2016, under Sections 15 and 29 of the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (for short, 'the

NDPS Act') registered at Police Station Siwan Kaithal, Appellants

were sentenced as under: -

Name of Offence Period of sentence Period of sentence convict and fine imposed in default of payment of fine.

Surjeet           15(b) of the RI for 06 months        SI for 01 month
Guman Ram         NDPS Act with a fine of              each
                               Rs. 10,000/- each

2. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid conviction and

sentence, instant appeal was filed on 05.02.2024. However, learned

counsel for the appellants has limited his prayer to modify the order of

sentence dated 12.01.2024 (supra), so as to sentence the appellants for

the period already undergone by them.

3. Learned State Counsel has produced the custody certificate

dated 27.02.2024 to contend that the appellants have already undergone

more than 03 months out of the total sentence of six months awarded to

them. He does not oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the

appellants.

4. Although the learned counsel for the appellants have not

challenged the genuineness of the impugned judgment of conviction

dated 12.01.2024 but yet from the perusal of the impugned judgment, it

transpires that it is based on correct appreciation of evidence on record

and is not suffered from any infirmity so as to call for any interference.

2 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:034772

CRA-S-616-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:034772

As a consequent the conviction recorded vide judgment dated

12.01.2024 by learned Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Judge Special

Court Kaithal against the appellants is hereby upheld.

5. Coming to the limited request raised by the learned

counsel for the appellants in this case seeking modification of order of

sentence dated 12.01.2024 and keeping in view the fact that the

appellants have no criminal antecedents, it is observed that the State

counsel has also not disputed the fact that the appellants are not having

any criminal track and are first offenders. As per the custody

certificate, the appellants have already undergone more than 3 months

of their actual custody, therefore, in these circumstances considering

the fact that the appellants are not previous offenders and have already

undergone more than 3 months of actual custody out of 6 months vide

the impugned order of sentence dated 12.01.2024.

6. Resultantly, in these circumstances of the case, the

impugned order of sentence dated 12.01.2024 is modified to the period

already undergone by the petitioner in custody, therefore, the present

appeal is disposed of with the modification in the impugned order of

sentence dated 12.01.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions

Judge-cum-Judge, Special Court, Kaithal, thereby reducing the

sentence of the petitioner already undergone by them subject to

payment of ₹10,000/- as fine imposed vide impugned order dated

12.01.2024 in default of the payment of fine they have to further

3 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:034772

CRA-S-616-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:034772

undergo simple imprisonment for one month each.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.




                                                 (SANJIV BERRY)
11.03.2024                                           JUDGE
 Gyan

             i)       Whether speaking/reasoned?                Yes/No

             ii)      Whether reportable?                       Yes/No




Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:034772

4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter