Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 614 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
SANDEEP SETHI 2024.01.11 16:27 2024:PHHC:003194 CRM-M-1348-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) CRM-M-1348-2024 Date of Decision:-11.01.2024 Harjinder Singh @ Veeru beeeee Petitioner Versus State of Punjab beeeee Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN 3 2 3 3k Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab. 3k 6 2 ie ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition is under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.0093 dated 23.06.2021 under Sections 22, 25, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Dakha, Ludhiana Rural, Ludhiana, Punjab.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted the concession of regular bail in the said FIR on 10.09.2021 and had been attending the proceedings continuously thereafter. However, on 04.10.2023, he absented himself on account of noting a wrong date which was noted by him as 10.04.2024. Subsequently vide order dated 15.11.2023, the bail bonds were cancelled and the surety was forfeited and non-bailable warrants were issued against the petitioner on 15.11.2023. It
was only thereafter that the petitioner came to know about the said
| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment
SANDEEP SETHI 2024.01.11 16:27
2024:PHHC:003194 CRM-M-1348-2024
proceedings and has approached this Court.
3. At this stage, issuance of notice or seeking a reply from State would only procrastinate the proceedings which is not in the interest of justice.
4. Per contra, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner willfully absented himself from the proceedings and in fact there is one more case under the NDPS Act which was lodged in the year 2019 against the petitoiner.
5. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that the next date of hearing before the trial Court is 03.02.2024, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the concerned Court within one week from today which shall release him on his furnishing of fresh bail bonds and a heavy surety and also the trial Court is directed to proceed in the trial in accordance with law.
6. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in any such activity once again, the State is at liberty to promptly move an appropriate application for cancellation of bail detailing out the
circumstances and violation of the condition(s) of bail.
(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE January 11, 2024.
Sandeep Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!