Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7174 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:045966
CWP-3936-2021 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:045966
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
245
WP-3936-2021 (O&M)
C
Date of decision: 04.04.2024
Manmeet Kaur ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral)
1. The prayer inthepresentCivilWritPetitionfiledunderArticles
226/227 of the Constitution of India, is to issue a writ in the nature of
certiorari, for quashing of order dated 15.01.2021, Annexure P-8 and for
directing the respondents to rectify the anomaly in the pay scale along with
arrears of pay.
2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was promoted from
the post of Restorer to Assistant Librarian, however, the pay granted to him
remained at the existingpayscaleatRs.5910-20200+2800whichwaslower
than that of Restorer. Similarly situated persons, who were working on the
same post, as that of the petitioner had approached this Court by filing
CWP-6361-2016, Netar Singh and others vs. State ofPunjabandothers,
which was allowed vide judgment dated 24.05.2018, in compliance thereof,
theyweregrantedthehigherpayi.e.10300-34800+3200gradepaywhilethe
samehasbeendeniedtothepetitionervideorderdated15.01.2021,Annexure
P-8, only on the premise thatshewasnotapartytothesaidwritpetition.In
thisregard,relianceisplacedonthejudgmentinthecaseofSatbirSinghvs.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:045966 CWP-3936-2021 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:045966
- 2- State of Haryana, 2002(2) S.C.T. 354, wherein a Division Bench of this
Court has held that when judgments attain finality to which the State is a
party, duty is casted upon the State to grant relief to its employees who are
similarlysituatedandonidenticalfactsanditisnotnecessaryfortheStateto
requireeachoneofitsemployeestoapproachtheCourtsoflawforthegrant
ofareliefwhichtheStateoughttogranttheemployeesinnormalcourseofits
administration. He thus prays, on instructions that the petitioner would be
satisfied,incaseadirectionisgiventotherespondentstodecideherclaimin
a time bound manner by granting her an opportunity of hearing.
3. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer
made.
4. Inviewoftheaforesaidandwithoutcommentinguponthemerits
of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the
respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, taking into
account the judgment passed in Netar Singh (supra) and benefit granted in
termsthereof,withinaperiodoffourmonthsandiffoundentitled,necessary
relief be granted to her forthwith.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 0 4.04.2024 Hemant
hether speaking/reasoned W : es / No Y Whether reportable : Yes / No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!