Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6769 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:042773
2024:PHHC:042773
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(132) RSA No. 672 of 1992 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 01.04.2024
State of Punjab
...Appellant
Versus
Hans Raj, Inspector
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
***
Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as nobody is
appearing on behalf of the respondent and while issuing notice of motion,
the operation of the judgment under challenge was stayed, the present
appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further
with liberty to revive the same in case, any execution of the impugned
judgment is preferred by the respondent for his legal right.
Ordered accordingly.
April 1st, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
1 of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!