Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dheeraj Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another
2024 Latest Caselaw 6733 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6733 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Dheeraj Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 1 April, 2024

                                Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:043394




                                            Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:043394
265
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                  AT CHANDIGARH

                                          CRM-M No. 33764 of 2023 (O&M)
                                          Date of Decision: 01.04.2024

Dheeraj Sharma

                                                                .......... Petitioner
                                        Versus

State of Haryana and another
                                                             .......... Respondents

CORAM:        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:      Mr. Nipun Vashist, Advocate
              for the petitioner.

              Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana
              for respondent No. 1.

              Ms. Anjali, Advocate for
              Mr. Devender Arya, Advocate alongwith
              respondent No. 2-Sanjay Kumar Sharma and his wife-Meenakshi Sharma.

                                ****
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner, by way of present petition filed under Section

482 Cr.P.C., seeks quashing of FIR No. 379 dated 16.06.2023 (Annexure P-

1) under Sections 363 & 364-A of IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-

10, District Gurugram, alongwith all consequential proceedings arising out

of the same on the basis of compromise / affidavit dated 21.06.2023

(Annexure P-5).

[2] This Court, vide order dated 20.01.2024, directed the parties to

appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements

with regard to the validity of compromise.

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:043394

[3] In pursuance of above order dated 20.01.2024, a report dated

13.02.2024 has been received from the concerned Court, stating that

compromise effected between the parties is genuine, voluntary and without

any coercion or undue influence. No accused has been declared as

proclaimed offender.

[4] Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment

dated 18.07.2022 passed by this Court in CRM-M-30483-2020, titled "Ravi

Kumar and others Versus State of Punjab and others", and also upon the

decision dated 22.01.2016, passed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in

Crl.M.C.-1695-2015, titled "Noor Salim Rana and Ors. Versus State (Govt.

of NCT of Delh) and Anr.", wherein under similar circumstances, FIR has

been quashed on the basis of compromise.

[5] On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, also

verifies / identifies the Aadhar Cards of respondent No. 2-Sanjay Kumar

Sharma and his wife-Meenakshi Sharma, who are present in Court. The

same are taken on record as Mark-X & Mark-Y respectively. Registry to

tag / paginate the same in the paper-book accordingly.

[6] Thus once, the compromise has been arrived at between the

parties without any pressure and respondent No. 2 having no objection as

regards quashing of FIR as well as all other subsequent proceedings arising

out of the same against the petitioner; there does not appear to be any

impediment as regards quashing of present FIR qua the petitioner. Even

otherwise, in order to maintain peace and harmony between the parties,

particularly under the present circumstances wherein the alleged offences

have no societal interest involved, it would be appropriate to render

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:043394

complete quietus to the aforementioned dispute by quashing the FIR on the

basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

[7] The parties having settled their dispute so as to live in peace in

future, no useful purpose would be served by proceeding further with the

criminal proceedings. In the light of above developments, no cause remains

for the Trial Court to invest further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR.

The compromise in question is even found to be fully in consonance with the

direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of

Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab

& Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.

[8] Thus, in view of the aforesaid facts, accompanied by statements

of both the parties as well as keeping in mind the law laid down in the

aforementioned judgments, the petition is allowed and the FIR (supra) as

well as all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua

the petitioner.

[9] The aforesaid order shall, however, be subject to payment of

costs of Rs. 20,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the Haryana

Police Welfare Fund, within a period of two weeks from today.

April 01, 2024                                         ( HARKESH MANUJA )
'dk kamra'                                                  JUDGE

             Whether Speaking/reasoned                  Yes/No

             Whether Reportable                         Yes/No




                                  3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter