Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6729 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024
2024:PHHC:043314
216
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RSA-3454-1997 (O&M)
Date of decision : 01.04.2024
Harbhajan Singh & Ors. ... Appellant(s)
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Saurav Kanojia, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. B.S. Bali, Addl. AG Punjab
for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
IOIN-RSA-3454-1997
1. The present IOIN has been put up for service of respondent
Nos.3 to 5.
2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the main appeal may
be heard today itself.
3. In view of the above, with the consent of the learned counsel
for the parties, the main appeal is taken on Board today itself. IOIN stands
disposed off.
RSA-3454-1997
4. The present regular second appeal has been preferred by the
plaintiff-appellants challenging the judgment and decree dated 27.09.1996
passed by the First Appellate Court.
integrity of this order/judgment.
2024:PHHC:043314
RSA-3454-1997 (O&M) -2-
5. The original suit was filed for recovery of Rs.2,200/- which was
decreed by the Trial Court vide the judgment and decree dated 14.01.1994.
Aggrieved by the same, the respondents preferred an appeal before the First
Appellate Court which was allowed vide judgment and decree dated
27.09.1996. Hence, the present regular second appeal.
6. Section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as it stood in
1997 reads as under :
"102. No second appeal in certain suits : No second
appeal shall lie in any suit of the nature cognizable by
Courts of Small Causes, when the amount or value of the
subject matter of the original suit does not exceed three
thousand rupees."
7. The pecuniary subject matter of the suit indisputably does not
exceed rupees three thousand and hence in view of the provisions of Section
102 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as it stood at the relevant time, no
second appeal would be maintainable. Even under the amended Section 102
CPC, no second appeal would be maintainable.
8. In view of the above, the present appeal is accordingly
dismissed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
01.04.2024 ( ALKA SARIN )
Yogesh Sharma JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
integrity of this order/judgment.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!