Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6725 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024
2024:PHHC:043280
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
124-A CR-1919-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 01.04.2024
HARPREET KAUR .... Petitioner
VERSUS
SURINDER KAUR (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Ms. Harpreet Kaur (petitioner) in person.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 27.02.2024 (Annexure
P-17) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rupnagar in Civil
Suit being CS-963-2020 dated 23.12.2020 whereby the learned Civil Judge
(Junior Division), Rupnagar has referred the matter to the learned District
and Sessions Judge, Rupnagar for passing appropriate orders with regard to
transferring the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction due to personal
reasons. Further prayer is for staying the impugned order dated 27.02.2024
(Annexure P-17).
2. Petitioner has appeared in person and has contended that the
application for striking off the defence of defendant-respondent No.3,
namely, Bhupinder Singh was still pending and hence the matter ought not
to have been transferred.
3. Heard.
4. The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Rupnagar vide order
dated 27.02.2024 has made a reference to the learned District and Sessions
integrity of this judgment/order.
2024:PHHC:043280
124-A CR-1919-2024 (O&M) -2-
Judge, Rupnagar for transferring the matter to the Court of competent
jurisdiction due to personal reasons. The said reference is still pending and is
fixed for today itself i.e. 01.04.2024. Since the matter is pending before the
learned District and Sessions Judge, Rupnagar for directions on the transfer
of the present case, there is no occasion for this Court to pass any directions
as the Officer concerned has asked for transfer of the Court for personal
reasons. Further, in the impugned order dated 27.02.2024 it is noticed that
the application dated 04.12.2023 under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC was
withdrawn by the plaintiff-petitioner and a fresh application under Order
VIII Rule 10 CPC was filed.
5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. Pending
applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
01.04.2024 (ALKA SARIN)
Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: YES/NO
integrity of this judgment/order.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!