Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 16691 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2023
CWP-21357-2023 -1-
Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:126184
116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-21357-2023
Date of Decision: September 25, 2023
Jagroop Singh and another
......Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr.Manoj Kaushik, Advocate
for the petitioners.
........
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
Petitioners have approached this Court praying for issuance of
direction to the official respondents to finalize the execution of Dakhal
proceedings against private respondents No.4 to 7 whereby irrigation
channel/water course (outlet No.7018/L) to the petitioners' fields has been
illegally demolished/obstructed by respondents No.4 to 7 and their
musclemen, which is causing serious trouble & hardship to the petitioners.
It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that
the Executive Engineer, Madhopur Division, Gurdaspur, has already passed
the order, dated 25.03.2021, in favour of the petitioners, which is annexed as
Annexure P-2, but the same is not being implemented despite repeated
requests made by the petitioners. He submits that petitioners are facing
serious difficulty in getting their land due to non-implementation of the
order dated 25.03.2021.
Notice of motion to official respondents only at this stage. MEENU 2023.09.26 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:126184
On asking of the Court, Ms.Akshita Chauhan, Deputy Advocate
General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the
respondents/State.
After hearing counsel for the parties and going through the facts
and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a
direction to the petitioners to file an appropriate representation for redressal
of their grievances before respondent No.3, i.e. Divisional Canal Officer,
within ten days from today and in case any such representation is filed
before respondent No.3, he is directed to decide the same expeditiously in
accordance with law preferably within one month from the date of its
receipt.
September 25, 2023 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )
meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No
2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
MEENU
2023.09.26 15:01
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this
order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!