Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhupinder Kaur And Anr vs Punjab And Sind Bank And Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 14953 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14953 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Bhupinder Kaur And Anr vs Punjab And Sind Bank And Anr on 4 September, 2023
                                                                         2023:PHHC:116339

                                               C.R. No.750 of 2019                             -1-


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

                                                                                      Sr. No.271

                                                        Case No. : C.R. No.750 of 2019
                                                        Date of Decision : September 04, 2023

                               Bhupinder Kaur and another                     ....   Petitioners
                                                vs.
                               Punjab and Sind Bank and another               ....   Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURBIR SINGH.

                                           *    *   *
           Present :           Mr. Jasraj Singh, Advocate
                               for the petitioners.

                               Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate

for respondent no.1 - contesting respondent.

                                           *    *   *
           GURBIR SINGH, J. :

1. Challenge in this revision petition under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India is to the order dated 10.01.2019, passed by learned

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hoshiarpur (for brevity - the Trial

Court), thereby treating cross-examination of PW-1 as 'Nil'.

2. The brief facts, as culled out from the paper-book, are that

respondent no.1 - Punjab and Sind Bank (hereinafter referred to as - the

plaintiff) filed a suit for declaration in representative capacity, for setting

aside the purported transfer deed executed by petitioner no.1 in favour of

petitioner no.2 (hereinafter referred to as - defendant no.2 and defendant

no.3 respectively). None appeared on behalf of the defendant no.1 - General

Public despite notice. Defendants no.2 and 3 contested the suit, filed written

statement and issues were framed. PW-2 before the learned Trial Court was MONIKA 2023.09.12 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:116339

fully examined. The examination-in-chief of PW-1 was recorded but

learned counsel for defendants no.2 and 3 failed to conduct cross-

examination of the said witness despite repeated opportunities. So, vide

impugned order dated 10.01.2019, cross-examination of PW-1 was treated

as 'Nil'.

3. Learned counsel for the defendants no.2 and 3 has argued that

the plaintiff sought amendment of the plaint, which was allowed and

thereafter, written statement to the amended plaint was filed. Then, plaintiff

sought time to file replication and the case was adjourned to 17.12.2018,

when replication was filed and the case was adjourned to 10.01.2019. On

that date, PW-1 was present. An application for adjournment was made.

Learned Trial Court, considering that the witness had appeared on four dates

for his cross-examination, declined the application and cross-examination of

PW-1 was treated as 'Nil'. In fact, only one opportunity has been granted

after completion of amended pleadings.

4. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted that the suit was

filed through Mr. Parveen Palial, Senior Manager, Punjab and Sind Bank

(PW-1). He tendered his affidavit by way of examination-in-chief but

defendants no.2 and 3 failed to cross-examine the said witness. He appeared

before the Court for four times but his cross-examination was not conducted.

The said witness would have retired from service and now, it may not be

possible to procure his presence. So, the present petition deserves dismissal.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case

file.

MONIKA

6. No doubt, there was some omission on the part of defendants 2023.09.12 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:116339

no.2 and 3 in cross-examining the witness of plaintiff. He was bound down

for 18.09.2018, on which date plaintiff-Bank moved application for

amendment of plaint. The same was allowed and thereafter, written

statement to amended plaint was filed. The plaintiff sought adjournment to

file replication to the written statement to amended plaint, which was filed

on 17.12.2018 and the case was adjourned to 10.01.2019. On that day,

PW-1 was present. In fact, after amendment of pleadings, the first date fixed

for evidence was 10.01.2019, on which date an application for adjournment

was also filed. Learned Trial Court, keeping in view the fact that the witness

had appeared earlier as well but was not cross-examined, treated his cross-

examination to be 'Nil'.

7. Procedure is hand-maid to the administration of justice and is

meant for advancement of justice. The purpose of the Court is to do

complete and substantial justice to the parties. The cross-examination of

PW-1 is necessary for just decision of the case. Otherwise, defendants no.1

and 2 would suffer adversely.

8. Learned counsel for defendants no.1 and 2 states that only one

opportunity may be granted and cross-examination of PW-1 shall be

conducted on the same very date.

9. Keeping in view the aforesaid, I am of the considered view that

ends of justice would be met if the impugned order is set aside and the

petitioners/defendants no.1 and 2 be granted one more opportunity for cross-

examination of PW-1, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs, to be paid

to PW-1 by defendants no.1 and 2. It has further been apprised to this Court

MONIKA that the next date fixed before the learned Trial Court is 19.09.2023. 2023.09.12 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:116339

Therefore, it is directed that the plaintiff-Bank shall intimate PW-1 to appear

in the Court on 19.09.2023 for the purpose of his cross-examination. If for

any reason, the learned Trial Court is not able to conduct the cross-

examination on that day, then the same shall be conducted on the very next

day. In case PW-1 has retired and plaintiff-Bank is not able to contact him,

then, plaintiff-Bank shall inform the learned Trial Court accordingly and the

Trial Court may pass the order in accordance with law for summoning the

said witness. In that eventuality, when PW-1 will appear, then defendants

no.1 and 2 shall cross-examine him on the same day.

10. The revision petition stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

11. It is hereby made clear that in case of any default, this order

shall stand automatically vacated.

12. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of along with

this judgment.

           September 04, 2023                                     (GURBIR SINGH)
           monika                                                     JUDGE

                               Whether speaking/reasoned ?        Yes/No.
                               Whether reportable ?               Yes/No.




MONIKA
2023.09.12 09:27
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter