Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sneh Lata vs Manoj Kumar
2023 Latest Caselaw 14803 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14803 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sneh Lata vs Manoj Kumar on 1 September, 2023
                               TA-1344-2022 (O&M)
                                                                                                                1

                                                                                               2023:PHHC:114709

                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                                              CHANDIGARH

                                                                                       TA-1344-2022 (O&M)
                                                                                  Date of decision: 01.09.2023

                               Sneh Lata
                                                                                                    ....Petitioner
                                                                        Versus
                               Manoj Kumar
                                                                                                  ....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present: Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)

Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed

under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending in the Family

Court, Kurukshetra to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Kaithal.

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of a

matrimonial discord, the petitioner has filed a petition under Section

125 Cr.P.C. and a petition under the Domestic Violence Act at Kaithal.

Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the

respondent/husband has filed the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu

Marriage Act, as a counter-blast, before the Principal Judge, Family

Court, Kurukshetra.

Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account

of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing

great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of

about 52 Kms from Kaithal to Kurukshetra.

Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments MOHD YAKUB 2023.09.02 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

TA-1344-2022 (O&M)

2023:PHHC:114709

"Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay", 2002 SC 396 and "Rajani Kishor

Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi", 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein

the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the

transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage

and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and

transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should

ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and

the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue

hardships."

It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a

matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to

consider the family condition of the wife, the custody of the minor

child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning

capacity of the husband and most important the convenience of the wife

i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her

family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence

as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.

Counsel for the respondent has, however, not disputed the

factual position but opposed the submissions made by counsel for the

petitioner.

After hearing the counsel for the parties, considering the

fact that the petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and

transportation expenses and in view of the judgments i.e. Sumita

Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's case (supra)

passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to

MOHD YAKUB 2023.09.02 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

TA-1344-2022 (O&M)

2023:PHHC:114709

allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Kurukshetra will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Kaithal.

2. The District Judge, Kaithal, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.

3. The Family Court, Kurukshetra is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, Kaithal.

4. The parties are directed to appear before the trial Court, Kaithal, within a period of 01 month from today.

Disposed of.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE

01.09.2023 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

Whether reportable: Yes/No

MOHD YAKUB 2023.09.02 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter