Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil vs State Of Punjab And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 20100 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 20100 P&H
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Anil vs State Of Punjab And Others on 20 November, 2023
ASHISH

CRWP No.11296 of 2023 (O&M) oe oe 2023:PHHC:147341

149 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No.11296 of 2023 (O&M)
Date of decision : 20.11.2023

Anil Petitioner
versus

The StateofPunjaband others 4... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

REE

Present :- Mr. Aditya Partap Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.

REE

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

1 This writ petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus is filed seeking direction to official respondents to get the detenues (mentioned in para No. 2 of the petition), released from the illegal detention of respondents No. 4 & 5.

2 Issue notice of motion.

3 On asking of the Court, Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. Requisite number of copies of the paper-books be handed over to him.

4 A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 32 of 2013, titled as 'Murti Versus The State of Punjab and others', decided on 11.01.2013 has held as under:-

"It may be mentioned here that the allegations of the appellant in the writ petition are that the alleged detenues mentioned in para No.3 of the writ petition who are working as labourers at the brick kiln of respondent No. 4 & 5 are being kept as bonded

labours. There can indeed be no doubt that if a labourer has

2023.11.21 15:27 | attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order

CRWP No.11296 of 2023 (O&M) mt 2023:PHHC:147341

been detained as bonded labour, it amounts to an offence under Sections 16 & 17 of the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976. We, however, clarify that the aforesaid observation does not mean that the allegations levelled by the appellant have been accepted. Suffice it to observe that under the Act, the District Magistrate is under statutory obligation to hold a fact finding enquiry as and when a compliant alleging violation of the provisions of Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 is received. Since the appellant in the instant case has specifically averred that the persons mentioned in para No.3 of the writ petition have been detained as bonded labourers, we allow this appeal and set aside/modify the order dated 9.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge to the extent that the petitioner's writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Sangrur, to treat this writ petition as a complaint under the 1976 Act and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order alongwith a copy of

the writ petition."

Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed off with a

direction to respondent No.2 (District Magistrate, Mohali) to consider the

representation dated 14.11.2023 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in

accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of

a certified copy of this order.

(PANKAJ JAIN ) JUDGE November 20, 2023 ashish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No

ASHISH

2023.11.21 15:27

| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order

Whether Reportable : Yes/No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter