Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mritunjay Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Another
2023 Latest Caselaw 19853 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19853 P&H
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mritunjay Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Another on 16 November, 2023
                                                                  Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:145514



CRM-M-47743-2023                                                                                1




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

                                    AT CHANDIGARH



                                                                 CRM-M-47743-2023 (O&M)
                                                                    Reserved on: 03.11.2023
                                                                 Pronounced on: 16.11.2023

Mritunjay Kumar
                                                                                 ... Petitioner(s)
                                       Versus
State of Punjab & another
                                                                                ...Respondent (s)


CORAM:          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:-       Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate and
                Mr. Chetan Mittal, Sr. Advocate with
                Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate and
                Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate
                for the petitioner(s).

                Mr. Gaurav Garg Duriwala, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

                Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate
                for respondent nos2.
                        ***

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No.     Dated        Police Station            Sections
41          5.5.2023     Division         No.3, 279, 337, 427 IPC and Section 3(x) and 4 of
                         District      Police the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes
                         Commissionerate,          (Prevention    of   Atrocities),    Act,   1989,
                         Ludhiana                  Sections 3(x) and 4 deleted and Section 3(s)
                                                   of the SC/ST Act later on.


Seeking quashing of the FIR, captioned above, which was registered just because the petitioner was sitting in the vehicle driven by co-accused Parvinder Singh in which another co-accused Bhawna Gupta was also sitting and had no role to play, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC.

2. Prosecution's case is that based on the statement made by one Gagan, the aforesaid FIR was registered, the translated copy of which is annexed as Annexure P-1 and its translation is not disputed by any of the parties. The contents of the FIR read as

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:145514

under:-

"Statement of Gagan wife of Rajinder Kumar resident of Balmiki Colony Ludhiana aged 50 years. Stated that I am resident of the said address and am a house wife. Today, on 05.05.2023 I alongwith Neelam Rani Resident of 991, Near Balmiki Mandir Chowk Division No. 3 and Sharda Resident of Ghaati Mohalla, Ludhiana were going to the inauguration of the new Mohalla Clinic by Chief Minister Bhagwant Maan at Mohalla Harcharan Nagar and were getting down from the e-Riksha near Shingaar Cinema crossing, and immediately upon getting down, a car driver while driving carelessly hit me from one side and while I was trying to defend myself; my right hand was injured due to the impact of the vehicle and due to the impact of the vehicle my mobile phone brand Samsung Galaxy fell down from my hand and was broken. On reading the number of the vehicle I found it to be UP-16-CD-6327 of Innova make Color White. The driver of the vehicle started arguing with me and when I asked to the driver of the vehicle that why did you hit the vehicle into me and because of being hit by your vehicle, I have been injured and the phone of a poor has been broken. On this, alongwith the car driver, another man and a woman also came there and they alongwith the car driver started abusing me and the woman started saying "Tum Neech Jaati waley chamaar logon ka yahi kaam hai, tum log gaadi walon se paisa aithne ke liye kisi vi had tak gir sakte ho" and after saying this when I objected to it a lot of people gathered there and after a while your police party reached the spot. I came to know the name of the driver of the car as Parminder Singh Rawat, the name of the other person who argued as Mritunjay Kumar and the women who uttered caste indicative words as Bhawna. That the driver of the said car while driving recklessly rammed the car into me and caused me injury and caused damage to my mobile and the car passenger Bhawna insulted me by publically using caste indicative words against my caste and I may be provided justice by taking suitable action against them as per law. I have got recorded my statement with you in presence of my known Neelam Rani & Sharda, gone through, it is correct. Sd/- Gagan."

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and gone through the entire record.

4. Counsel for the parties did not dispute the factum that the petitioner - Mritunjay Kumar was neither a driver of the vehicle nor had hurled any abuses. He was merely present in the vehicle along with co-accused and had no role to play. Even if the entire allegations as per the contents of the FIR are accepted to be true on its face value, still no case is made out against the petitioner - Mritunjay Kumar. His case is different from the other accused and as such, it is being decided separately.

5. The State has filed its reply by way of affidavit of concerned Assistant Commissioner of Police, Emergency Response-cum-Nodal Officer SC/ST Cases. It remains undisputed that the petitioner - Mritunjay Kumar did not hurl the alleged

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:145514

abuses, which according to the prosecution made out an offence under Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989 (for short, "the SC/ST POA Act"). It also remains undisputed that the petitioner was not driving the vehicle. Even the State, on instructions from the investigator admits that the offences under Sections 279 and 337 IPC have not been attributed to the petitioner. In addition to that, there is no allegation against the petitioner - Mritunjay Kumar of having committed any offence under Section 427 IPC, for the reason that there is no averment that he had caused any damage to any property. No allegation for damage to mobile phone was leveled against Bhawna Gupta or Mritunjay Kumar, because they were not driving the vehicle. It is strange that despite there being no allegation or involvement of the petitioner, he was arraigned as an accused, and was also arrested, though as per the petitioner's counsel, he got bail after custody of 4 days.

6. Given above, in the peculiar facts and circumstances, it is a fit case where the continuation of criminal proceedings shall amount to an abuse of the process of law, and the Court invokes its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC and quashes the FIR and all subsequent proceedings.

Petition allowed. All pending applications stand closed in tune with this judgment.




                                                             (ANOOP CHITKARA)
                                                                  JUDGE

November 16, 2023
AK

Whether speaking/reasoned             :              Yes
Whether reportable                    :              No




                                                              Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:145514

                                          3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter