Reshma And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 9028 P&H

SANDEEP SETHI
2023.06.08 06:37

2023:PHHC:081693
CRWP-5676-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(113)
CRWP-5676-2023.
Date of Decision:-07.06.2023.

Reshma and another

beeen Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
beeeee Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
3 2 3 3k
Present: Mr. Naveen Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab.
3k 6 2 ie
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that they both are major inasmuch as petitioner No.1 was born on 12.05.1990 and petitioner No.2 was born on 05.06.1980, and have married each other on 01.06.2023, with their free consent and without any coercion. Reliance has been placed upon Aadhaar Cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively), the Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-3) and photographs. It is also stated in the petition that a detailed representation dated 01.06.2023 (Annexure P-4) has also been given to respondent No.2 with regard to the same.

3. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only.

| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment.

SANDEEP SETHI 2023.06.08 06:37

2023:PHHC:081693 CRWP-5676-2023

4. On advance notice, Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 to 3 and on a specific query put by this Court, he has stated that he has no objection in case, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Hoshiarpur, looks into the representation dated 01.06.2023 (Annexure P-4) and takes appropriate action in accordance with law.

5. After considering the abovesaid facts and without commenting upon the legality of the marriage and expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation (Annexure P-4) and after considering the threat perception to the petitioners, respondent No.2 will take appropriate action in accordance with law.

6. It is, however, clarified that this order shall not debar the State

from proceeding against the petitioners, if involved in any case.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE

June 07, 2023.

Sandeep

Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No

| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment.