Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9604 P&H
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2023
2023:PHHC:085782
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.203 CRM-M-47544-2022
Date of Decision: July 07, 2023
VIKAS ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Present: Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Krishan K.Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
*****
RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.159 dated
18.04.2021 registered under Sections 323, 363, 377, 506 of IPC and Section
4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at Police Station
Kalanaur, District Rohtak.
2. Reply by way of an affidavit of Sh. Sandeep Kumar, HPS, DSP,
Meham and custody certificate of the petitioner have been filed in Court.
The same are taken on record.
3. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the case
against the petitioner is totally false, frivolous and concocted. This fact is
not disputed even by the testimony of the prosecution witnesses. The
complainant, i.e. mother as well as the father of the alleged victim both have
not supported the case of the prosecution. Rather, they have denied the story
created by the police. In any case, the petitioner is in custody for the past
about more than two years and two months. There is no other case ANKUR GOYAL 2023.07.07 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-47544-2022 --2-- 2023:PHHC:085782
registered against the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner deserves to be
released on bail pending trial.
4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel, referring to the status
report has submitted that the offence committed by the petitioner is quite
heinous. Not only that even the FSL report has shown the offence having
been committed by the petitioner. However, it is not disputed that the
complainant and the father of the victim have not supported the case of the
prosecution and that the petitioner is in custody for the past about more than
two years and two months. It is also not disputed that there is no other case
against the petitioner.
5. In view the above, but without expressing any further opinion
on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is
ordered to be released on bail pending trial subject to his furnishing bail
bonds/surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate,
concerned.
July 07, 2023 (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT)
Ankur JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
ANKUR GOYAL
2023.07.07 16:59
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!