Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11100 P&H
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:096187
CWP-15998-2023 -1- 2023:PHHC:096187
110
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-15998-2023
Date of Decision:27.07.2023
JHALMAN SINGH ......... Petitioner
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. K.K. Jund, Senior Panel Counsel,
for the respondents- UOI.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227
of the Constitution of India is seeking quashing of order dated
18.05.2023 (Annexure P-1) whereby respondent has rejected application
of the petitioner seeking passport.
2. The petitioner applied for passport on 24.02.2023. The
application of the petitioner has been declined on the ground that one
criminal case is pending against the petitioner.
3. An FIR No. 6 dated 06.11.2005 was registered against the
petitioner. The police after completing investigation filed its report and
petitioner came to be convicted vide order dated 06.03.2009 passed by
Special Judge, Chandigarh. The petitioner preferred CRA-S-719-SB-
2009 before this Court which stands admitted. The sentence of the
petitioner has been suspended vide order dated 02.04.2009 passed by this
Court.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:096187
CWP-15998-2023 -2- 2023:PHHC:096187
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that
case of the petitioner is squarely covered by Judgment dated 14.07.2023
passed by this Court in Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and
others, CWP No. 27167 of 2018.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact
that issue involved in the present case is squarely covered by judgment
of this Court dated 14.07.2023 passed in CWP No. 27167 of 2018.
6. The instant petition stands disposed of in view of aforesaid
judgment and passport authorities are directed to pass order in the same
terms.
7. It is made clear that if file of the petitioner has already been
closed, the petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh application which
thereafter shall be decided within 8 weeks.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
27.07.2023
Ali
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:096187
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!