Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagmohan Singh vs Ranbir Singh And Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 21079 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21079 P&H
Judgement Date : 5 December, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jagmohan Singh vs Ranbir Singh And Anr on 5 December, 2023

                                                        Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:155373




                                                      2023:PHHC:155295
CRM-M-46267-2023                                                      1

273      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       CHANDIGARH
                               CRM-M-46267-2023 (O&M)
                               Date of Decision: 05.12.2023

JAGMOHAN SINGH
                                                                ...Petitioner
                              V/S

RANBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER
                                                               ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present: Mr. Ishan Kaushal, Advocate
         for the petitioner.
                              ****
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No. 61 dated 10.07.2021

registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code

at Police Station Badali Ala Singh, District Fatehgarh Sahib and all

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise dated

29.03.2023 (Annexure P-2).

2. On 15.09.2023, following order was passed:

"Through this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.61 dated 10.07.2021, registered at Police Station Badali Ala Singh, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 29.03.2023 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to judgment dated 18.05.2023 (Annexure P-3) passed in civil appeal preferred by the petitioner against the respondents wherein factum of compromise effected between the parties has been noticed.

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:155373

2023:PHHC:155295

Notice of motion for 05.12.2023."

3. Mr. Aseem Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of

respondents No. 1 and 2, filed her power of attorney and the same is taken

on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that both the

aggrieved persons have been impleaded as respondents. Both the parties

have compromised the matter, which is evident from the judgment dated

18.05.2023 passed in Civil Appeal preferred by the petitioner against the

respondents and the relevant extract from the order passed by learned

Additional District is reproduced hereinbelow:

"In view of the compromise Ex. CX arrives interse the parties regarding which the parties have suffered statement in the court, therefore, the court deem it proper to dispose off the appeal in hand, in view of compromise Ex. CX with direction to the parties to bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise Ex. CX and statement suffered in the court."

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondents has admitted the

factum of compromise and submits that he has no objection in case the FIR

in question is quashed.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone

through the record with their able assistance.

6. The parties have arrived at a compromise and settled their

dispute. A compromise not only brings peace and harmony between the

parties to a dispute, but also restores tranquility in the society. After

considering the nature of offences allegedly committed and the fact that

both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, continuance of criminal

prosecution would be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:155373

2023:PHHC:155295

conviction are bleak. A two Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

Shakunta Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC

63, speaking through Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, has held as under:-

"4. ....The finest hour of justice arrives propitiously when

parties, despite falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave a

sense of fellowship or reunion....."

7. Consequently, keeping in view the fact that the dispute has been

amicably settled and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another,

(2014) 6 SCC 466 and Ramgopal and another Vs. State of Madhya

Pradesh 2021 SCC OnLine SC 834 and Full Bench of this Court in

Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this

petition is allowed and FIR No. 61 dated 10.07.2021 registered under

Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station

Badali Ala Singh, District Fatehgarh Sahib and all subsequent proceedings

arising out of the same are quashed qua the petitioner only.





                                                   (HARPREET SINGH BRAR)
05.12.2023                                                 JUDGE
Ajay Goswami

                      Whether speaking/reasoned        Yes/No
                      Whether reportable               Yes/No




Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:155373

3 of 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter