Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajay vs State Of Haryana
2023 Latest Caselaw 14270 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14270 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ajay vs State Of Haryana on 28 August, 2023
          CRR-1863-2023 (O&M)
          104                                                           2023:PHHC:112835
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                  CRR-1863-2023 (O&M)
                                                                  Date of decision: 28.08.2023
          Ajay
                                                                                             ....Petitioner
                                                         Versus
          State of Haryana
                                                                                            ...Respondent
          CORAM:               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

          Present:-            Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate for petitioner.

                  Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana.
                                          *****
          ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

Revision petition is directed against order dated 20.07.2023 passed by

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat in bail application No.1532 of 2023 titled

'Ajay Versus State of Haryana', whereby petitioner's bail application under Section

167(2) Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.781 dated 25.12.2022 registered under Section 20 of

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act'), at Police

Station, Industrial Sector -29, Panipat, District Panipat, was dismissed.

2. Per prosecution case, on 25.12.2022,SI Satpal Singh along with otherpolice

officials was on routine patrolling and checking, when petitioner and his co-accused were

intercepted by police on the basis of secret information. After carrying out formalities,

search was conducted. SI carried out the search of both the boys along with bags. On

checking, both bags were found containing two polythene bags. One white coloured

polythene was found containing charas weighing about 1 kg 70 gram and second green

coloured polythene was found containing charas weighing about 1 kg 600 gm. FIR was

registered and petitioner was arrested from the spot on 25.12.2022 and is in custody ever

since.

3. Learned counsel contends that alleged recovery has been planted on him.

Petitioner has thus been falsely implicated. Petitioner is not involved in any other case.

He is totally innocent. Petitioner has indefeasible right to be released on bail as per

provisions of section 167(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act. He further

contends that in the present case, the police has submitted the challan without report of

VANDANA FSL, which amounts to incomplete challan, as envisaged under Section 173 (5) Cr.P.C. 2023.08.29 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and

CRR-1863-2023 (O&M) and therefore, petitioner is entitled to default bail. He applied for the same before learned

Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, but the same was dismissed vide order impugned

herein.

3.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in any case, alleged

contraband recovered from the petitioner was weighed along with plastic bag and it is

thus that the total weight is stated to be 1 kg 600 grams, which too is marginally higher

than commercial quantity. There is every chance that recovery may fall in non-

commercial quantity, owing to error in weighment and inclusion of weight of polythene

bag with the alleged contraband.

3.2 He also refers to a Division Bench Judgment of this Court in case Ajit

Singh alias Jeeta and another vs. State of Punjab1 to contend that report of chemical

examiner must be mandatorily included in the final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. and

in the absence of the same, challan would be incomplete and Court is not competent to

take cognizance of the offence in an incomplete challan.

3.2 He also submits that nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner and he is

not required for further custodial interrogation. There is no likelihood of petitioner

tampering with evidence and/ or influencing prosecution witnesses.

4. Per contra learned State counsel submits that challan presented by the

police cannot be said to be incomplete as FSL report is a per se admissible document

which can be produced at any time during course of trial in view of Section 293 of

Cr.P.C. He further points out that FSL report has been filed by the prosecution on

25.08.2023.

4.1. He further submits that petitioner has committed a serious offence.In case,

petitioner is granted concession of bail, there are chances of hisfleeing from justice. He

submits that per his instructions, 1 kg 620 gram charas contained in polythene bag was

recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned State counsel further

contends that recovery of contraband falls under commercial quantity andrigors of

Section 37 of NDPS Act would be attracted in this case. He however, admits that no

other case is pending against him.

VANDANA 1 09:58 2023.08.29 Criminal Revision No.4659-2015 decided on 30.11.2018 I attest to the accuracy and

CRR-1863-2023 (O&M)

5. I have heard rival contentions of learned counsels for the parties and have

gone through the case file.

6. There is force in the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that

police report filed without the Chemical Examiner Report is an incomplete challan in

view of ratio laid down by Division Bench of Court in Ajay Singh's case (supra),

thereby entitling him to claim default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section

36A(4) of the NDPS Act.

7. That apart, on a Court query, learned State counsel, on instructions from

ASI Balinder submits that challan was filed but charges are yet to be framed.

Investigation qua the petitioner is complete. Petitioner is thus not required for custodial

interrogation. Allegations against the petitioner are a matter of trial at this stage. There

are 13 prosecution witnesses. Commencement/conclusion of trial will take some time as

it is proceeding at a snail pace. Bail allows an accused to maintain his freedom until his

guilt or innocence is determined. Whereas, petitioner has already been in jail for the last

more than 08 months, being in custody since 25.12.2022.

8. Petitioner is being kept in preventive custody merely on an unfounded

suspicion that if he is let out, he may either tamper with evidence and/ or influence

witnesses. There is no documentary evidence and it is more in the nature of FSL report

qua contraband, already filed in the trial Court to which accused has no access. There is

no probability of tampering with evidence as the same has already been seized by the

investigating agency.As regards witnesses, they are all official and therefore, they are

unlikely to be influenced, even if there is any such apprehension by the prosecution.

9. Be that as it may, offence allegedly committed by petitioner is of non-

violent nature and in that sense his release on bail is not a threat to society at large by

committing any violent crime. In any case, allegations against petitioner are matter of

trial. At this stage, there appears to be a reasonable ground that petitioner maynot be

guilty of the alleged offence. He is unlikely to commit any offence while on bail.

10. Petitioner is stated to be family man with responsibilities, having fixed

abode and clean antecedents, it is unlikely that he poses any flight risk and/or will flee

VANDANA from trial proceedings.

2023.08.29 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and

CRR-1863-2023 (O&M)

11. Considering the overall scenario and without commenting on the merits of

the case, the instant petition is allowed. I am of the view that no useful purpose would be

served to keep the petitioner in further preventive custody.

12. Accordingly, instant revision petition is allowed and order dated

20.07.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat is set aside. Petitioner

is ordered to be released on bail, if not required in any other case, on his furnishing bail

bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, where his case is being

tried and in case he/she is not available, before learned Duty Judge, as the case may be.

13. In case, petitioner is found to be involved or gets involved in any offence

while on bail, the prosecution shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of his bail in the

instant case.

14. It is made clear that any observations and/or submissions noted hereinabove

shall not have any effect on merits of the case as the same are for the limited purpose of

hearing the instant bail petition alone and learned trial Court shall proceed without being

influenced with this order.

15. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.




                                                                          (ARUN MONGA)
                                                                              JUDGE
          28.08.2023
          vandana

          Whether speaking/reasoned:                       Yes/No
          Whether reportable:                              Yes/No




VANDANA
2023.08.29 09:58
I attest to the accuracy and

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter