Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11958 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:100847
2023:PHHC:100847
CRM-M-53433-2021 -1-
241
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-53433-2021
Date of decision :04.08.2023
RAJNEESH KHATTAR
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Ajay Madan in person respondent No.2.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of an FIR No.51
dated 02.02.2007 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 406 and 34
IPC, 1860 at Police Station Sadar Patiala, District Patiala along with all
consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a
compromise arrived at between the parties.
Vide order dated 01.04.2022 this Court had directed the
parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements
recorded with regard to the compromise dated 30.11.2013 (P-7) and the
Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this regard giving
certain details as enumerated in the said order.
Pursuant to the order dated 01.04.2022 passed by this Court,
the parties have appeared before the Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Patiala and as per the report dated 23.02.2023 submitted to
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:100847
2023:PHHC:100847
this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements
in Court.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties
have a effected genuine compromise without there being any pressure,
coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a
remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the
prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised
in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of
criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances
of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be
fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in "Kulwinder
Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".
Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner, while placing
reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Versus State of Gujarat and another,
2012(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 589 and this Court in Joginder Singh &
another Vs. State of Punjab and another, CRM-M-23739-2010
decided on 27.04.2011, Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab &
another, CRM-M-37395-2016 decided on 16.05.2017, Bhoj Raj Vs.
State of Punjab & another, CRM-24945-2019 decided on 27.09.2019
and Vimal Kalra & others Versus State of Punjab & another, CRM-
M-20355-2022, decided on 25.07.2022 submits that partial quashing of
the FIR was possible on the basis of a compromise.
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:100847
2023:PHHC:100847
In view of the aforesaid report of the Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Patiala accompanied by statements of both the
parties, the FIR No.51 dated 02.02.2007 (Annexure P-1) registered under
Sections 406 and 34 IPC, 1860 at Police Station Sadar Patiala, District
Patiala along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are
hereby quashed qua the petitioner.
Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 04.08.2023 JITESH
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:100847
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!