Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3603 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:050755
2023:PHHC:050755
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
226 CWP-20372-2017 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.04.2023
Savita
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:- Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG Haryana.
****
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition is for issuance of a writ in the
nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 11.08.2017 (Annexure P-9)
passed by the Director Elementary Education, Haryana, whereby the
candidature of the petitioner for the post of Junior Basic Teacher (JBT) in the
cadre of Rest of Haryana except Mewat in terms of the Advt. No. 02/2012
(Cat. No.1) dated 08.11.2012 and notice/advertisement dated 15.11.2013 was
cancelled. A further prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of
Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to give the
samples of her signatures/thumb impressions to the constituted Team and
officials of the State Crime Record Bureau, Madhuban, Karnal.
At the outset, learned State counsel draws the attention of this
Court towards the letter dated 11.04.2023 issued by the Directorate of
Elementary Education, Haryana, wherein it is mentioned that the name of the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:050755
2023:PHHC:050755
226 CWP-20372-2017 (O&M) -2-
petitioner was recommended by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission
vide letter dated 04.08.2015 in waiting list in compliance of order passed in
CWP-346-2013 titled as 'Antim Kumari & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.'.
It is further mentioned therein that the report from the FSL Madhuban,
Karnal, qua the petitioner, had been received and that in view of the judgment
dated 13.09.2022 rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP Diary No.
25269 of 2022 titled as 'Vikas Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors'
(arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-07-2022 in LPA
No. 912/2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh),
the petitioner could not be granted the benefit of appointment, being selected
in the 2nd waiting list.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also
gone through the paper-book.
As noticed above, the stand of the respondent-State is based on
the communication dated 11.04.2023 issued by the Directorate of Elementary
Education, Haryana to the effect that the name of the petitioner was in the
second waiting list and in view of the judgment in Vikas Kumar's case
(supra), she could not be given appointment. The said stand could not be
disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed.
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)
JUDGE
11.04.2023
Mangal Singh
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:050755
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!