Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11650 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022
CWP-21539-2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(173) CWP-21539-2022
Date of Decision : September 19, 2022
Phooli Devi .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. S.N. Pillania, Advocate, for the petitioner.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner
retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2016
whereas, the pensionary benefits were released to the petitioner in the year
2021, hence, the petitioner is entitled for the grant of interest on the said
delayed release of the pensionary benefits keeping in view the judgment of
the Full Bench of this Court in A.S. Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab and
others, 1997(3) SCT 468.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has already raised the said grievance before the respondents by serving
upon them a legal notice dated 04.07.2022 (Annexure P-2), which is still
pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be
satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to respondent
1 of 2
No.2 to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Harish Nain, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana,
who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents raises no objection in
deciding the legal notice of the petitioner in a time bound manner by
passing an appropriate speaking order.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case or about the
entitlement of the petitioner for the relief which has been claimed by her in
the legal notice dated 04.07.2022 (Annexure P-2), the present writ petition
is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice
dated 04.07.2022 (Annexure P-2) within a period of eight weeks from the
receipt of copy of this order.
In case, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for the
monetary benefits after the decision of the legal notice, the same should also
be paid to the petitioner within four weeks thereafter.
September 19, 2022 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
harsha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!