Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15066 P&H
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2022
202-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RSA-759-1992 (O&M)
Date of decision : 23.11.2022
Jagtar Singh ... Appellant(s)
Versus
Samund Singh ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
On 28.09.2022 the appearance of the counsel for the respondent
was wrongly marked as for the appellant. However, notice was issued to the
appellant for today. As per the office report, notice issued to the appellant
has been received back with the report that village belongs to Moga District.
Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate appearing for the appellant states
that he has no instructions in the matter as the present appeal was filed by
Mr. Ravinder Chopra, Mr. Arun Chandra and Mr. K.K. Thakur, Advocates.
Mr. Ravinder Chopra, Advocate is no more and Mr. Arun Chandra,
Advocate has since left the office. In view thereof, this Court is left with no
other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case
anything survives.
( ALKA SARIN )
23.11.2022 JUDGE
Yogesh Sharma
YOGESH SHARMA NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
2022.11.24 10:18
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
Whether reportable: YES/NO
Chandigarh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!