Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6300 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
108
CR-1371-2019 (O&M)
Date of decision: 06.07.2022
Taj Mohd.
...Petitioner
Versus
Rahisan and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Tushar Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Advocate, for respondent no.1.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
There is a joint decree against defendant no.1 and 2. The
plaintiff has been held entitled to recover the amount of sale consideration of
Rs.3,00,000/- along with expenses including stamp duty registration
charges etc. in respect of sale transactions along with interest @ 8% per
annum with effect from 04.07.2006 till its realization.
Judgement Debtor No.2 claims that he is liable to pay only the
proportionate amount. Once the decree is joint and several, the amount can
be recovered from one or both the parties. The Judgment Debtor No.2
cannot claim that he will only pay part thereof.
The second objection is with regard to cancellation of the sale
deed. The Court has already declared the same to be illegal. There is no
provision for getting the sale deed cancelled. It can only be declared illegal
by the Court which has already been ordered.
1 of 2
CR-1371-2019 (O&M) -2-
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to interfere with
the impugned order is made out.
Dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
July 06, 2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
nt JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!