Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kulvir Singh vs State Of Punjab
2021 Latest Caselaw 896 P&H

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 896 P&H
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2021

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Kulvir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 3 March, 2021
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH
210
                                                    CRM-M-33722-2020
                                             Date of decision: 03.03.2021

Kulvir Singh                                                   .....Petitioner
                                   Versus

State of Punjab                                              .....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI

Present :   Mr. Fatehjeet Singh, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

            Mr. Amit Mehta, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
            for the respondent-State.

                                    ****

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J (ORAL)

The petitioner has filed the present (third) petition under

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of

regular bail in case FIR No.114 dated 25.07.2018 registered under

Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,

1985 (for short, "the NDPS Act") at Police Station Goraya, District

Jalandhar to which Section 29 of the NDPS Act was added lateron.

His first petition for grant of regular bail was dismissed as

withdrawn vide order dated 30.04.2019 while second petition for grant

of regular bail was dismissed on merits vide order dated 29.01.2020.

Custody certificate has been filed by the learned State

Counsel today in Court which is taken on record.

The petition has been opposed by the learned State

Counsel. However, no reply has been filed by the respondent-State.

I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

State Counsel and gone through the relevant record.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

1 of 3

despite directions given by this Court for expediting the trial of the

case, the prosecution evidence has not yet been concluded. Father of

the petitioner is suffering from serious ailments and his surgery is

required. The petitioner also has three minor children to look after.

The petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2018. The trial is likely to take

long time due to restrictions imposed to prevent the spread of Covid-19.

No useful purpose will be served by further detention of the petitioner

in custody during trial. Therefore, the petitioner may be granted regular

bail.

In support of his arguments, learned Counsel for the

petitioner has placed reliance on the observations made by Hon'ble

Supreme Court in its judgment passed in Criminal Appeal

No.245/2020 titled as 'Chitta Biswas alias Subhas Vs. The State of

West Bengal decided on 07.02.2020 and by this Court in judgments

passed in CRM-M-906-2020 titled as 'Jorawar Singh Vs. State of

Punjab' decided on 14.01.2021 and CRM-M-6687-2020 titled as

'Avtar Singh Vs. State of Punjab' decided on 09.02.2021.

On the other hand, learned State Counsel has submitted

that the petitioner is accused of having kept in his conscious possession

commercial quantity of heroin. Rigors of Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS

Act are applicable to the case. The petition for grant of regular bail

filed by the petitioner earlier was dismissed on merits vide order dated

29.01.2020. No new ground for grant of regular bail to the petitioner is

made out. Therefore, the petition may be dismissed.

In Gajanand Aggarwal Vs. State of Orissa and others :

2006 (4) RCR (Criminal) 311 decided on 18.09.2006, it was observed

2 of 3

by Hon'ble Supreme Court that orders granting bail are not orders of

any precedent value.

In the present case the second petition for grant of regular

bail filed by the petitioner was dismissed on merits vide order dated

29.01.2020. As per medical certificate dated 14.08.2020 father of the

petitioner was diagnosed as a case of 'fissure in ano' and requires

hospitalisation and surgical treatment. During any such hospitalisation

and surgical treatment father of the petitioner can be looked after by his

wife and other members of the family. There is no material change in

the facts and circumstances of the case on appreciation of which the

second petition for grant of regular bail was dismissed on merits.

Consequently, no new ground for grant of regular bail to the petitioner

is made out.

In view of the above, the present petition for grant of

regular bail to the petitioner is hereby dismissed.

03.03.2021                                      (ARUN KUMAR TYAGI)
Vinay                                                  JUDGE
               Whether speaking/reasoned        :      Yes/No
               Whether reportable               :      Yes/No




                                   3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter