Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 664 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.103
CWP No.21893 of 2020
DATE OF DECISION: February 18, 2021
VIRENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present: Mr. T.S. Hundal, Advocate for
Mr. Keshav Gupta, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
*****
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The grievance of the petitioners is that despite representation,
they are not being granted appointment notionally w.e.f. the date the other
selectees of the same selection process were appointed. Even representation
dated 10.09.2020 (Annexure P-6) has not been responded to. Reliance has
been placed upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in Balwant Singh
Narwal and others vs. State of Haryana and others, (2008) 7 SCC 728.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on
behalf of the State of Haryana and waives service.
Considering the nature of the order being passed there is no
necessity to seek a reply from the respondents.
1 of 2
CWP No.21893 of 2020 --2--
The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2
to consider the pending representation dated 10.09.2020 (Annexure P-6) in
accordance with law on the subject and to decide the same by passing a
speaking order, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this order.
February 18, 2021 (SUDHIR MITTAL)
Ankur JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!