Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 598 P&H
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2021
CRM-M-5016-2021 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-5016-2021
Date of Decision :- 15.2.2021
Harminder Singh alias Ramu
.......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.......Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present: Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner.
****
H.S.MADAAN, J. (ORAL)
This is a second petition for grant of pre-arrest bail filed
by petitioner/accused Harminder Singh @ Ramu. His first petition bearing
CRM-M-34108-2020 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 28.10.2020.
The order for ready reference is being reproduced as under:
"Case taken up through video conferencing.
After arguing for sufficient time, realizing that the Court
was not inclined to grant the relief, learned counsel for the petitioner states that
he be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn."
Now the petitioner has again approached this Court for
grant of pre-arrest bail. This petition is not maintainable. The Apex Court in a
recent judgment G.R. Ananda Babu Versus The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Decided on 28.1.2021 has observed that successive anticipatory bail applications
ought not be entertained and more so when the case diary and the status report
clearly indicated that the accused is absconding and not co-operating with the
investigation.
1 of 2
This petition is nothing but misuse of process of law.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner has expressed
regrets and sought permission to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
15.2.2021 (H.S. MADAAN)
Brij JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!